Porn became easier to access. Men became less horny.
Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
31–40 of 102 posts
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#32this comes to show that sex is just entertainment and it is being crowded out from all sides
It's fascinating to me how personal choice never seems to enter into these discussions, even in relatively highly educated, first-world democracies. I actively chose to not have kids -- it was not an accidental by-product of iphones or any other proposed environmental factor.
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#33It is "birth control" but in sort of opposite way. People are now much better informed, thanks to internet and devices like iphone. They do not have to relly on state education (that wants more babies) and popular shows like Friends. State founded school is not going to tell you it costs $1200000 to raise baby, or you have 50% chance it will be taken away. It will also push stats made in lab controlled conditions, an…
>it costs $1200000 to raise baby What exactly are you planning to do with all that money anyway? Consume things?
Wrt. the original post i'd agree with GP - better information/education is probably the most powerful birth control.
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#34Surely there's an enormous amount of money behind it, but where's the ROI ?
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
>it costs $1200000 to raise baby What exactly are you planning to do with all that money anyway? Consume things?
retire? Retiring only on Social Security is pretty tough, and $1.2M would provide like $4K/month income which on top of Social Security may allow for modest lifestyle in some low COL area. Wrt. the original post i'd agree with GP - better information/education is probably the most powerful birth control.
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#36The funny thing is that there was a study or an article suggesting Apple users got more sex than non Apple users.
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#37It is "birth control" but in sort of opposite way. People are now much better informed, thanks to internet and devices like iphone. They do not have to relly on state education (that wants more babies) and popular shows like Friends. State founded school is not going to tell you it costs $1200000 to raise baby, or you have 50% chance it will be taken away. It will also push stats made in lab controlled conditions, an…
>it costs $1200000 to raise baby What exactly are you planning to do with all that money anyway? Consume things?
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#38Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#39It is "birth control" but in sort of opposite way. People are now much better informed, thanks to internet and devices like iphone. They do not have to relly on state education (that wants more babies) and popular shows like Friends. State founded school is not going to tell you it costs $1200000 to raise baby, or you have 50% chance it will be taken away. It will also push stats made in lab controlled conditions, an…
You’re just making up numbers
Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe some people realized that they could wait a few years and still have kids later, and others didn't think about having kids purely though the lens of evolutionary biology.
Before political correctness hit this area, doctors' observations led to classifying any first pregnancy past 25yo as geriatric. Healthcare progresses in some areas, some (like DS) are rigid to socially defined trends.
Now ~20% of all pregnancies in the US are 35+.