Live data from Hacker News

Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

thefocalpoints.com

181–190 of 207 posts

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#181
post #19

I wonder if animals have always seen frogs as unpleasant medicine they need to eat occasionally. My dog would happily scarf them down if I let him. Or does it have to be IV administered? Also who thinks -- "hmm we've found a new random bacteria --- let's give a bunch of tumors to mice and then IV inject this random thing into them!"? There must have been something about the microbe that gave them a hint. Maybe it's i…

> unpleasant > happily I think you answered your own question really, a lot of animals just enjoy eating them (humans included!)

Tbf, I wouldn't trust my dog's judgement on what I should happily eat.

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> capitalism, i.e. not putting power solely in the hands of the wealthiest. This critique doesn't make sense. Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. You're actually a capitalist whether you know it or not and you agree with capitalism at a rudimentary level. Your complaint about "power in the hands of the wealthiest" is a matter of government dysfunction, not the economic system. In fact, the…

Private ownership of the means of production is one salient feature of capitalism, but it's not the definition. Capitalism is when capital controls everything, more-or-less.

Nope. Capitalism == private ownership of the means of production. There is no definition that exists or is taken seriously that defines capitalism in a major or minor way as a system in which "capital controls everything".

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As they say, "there is no ethical consumption." I've done my part by not having any kids.

I could not imagine living with such a self hating attitude. Every day must be torture to wake up to. Why choose to live with this view of the world, I just don't get it. Life is beautiful. Children are incredible. I hope you break out of your self inflicted prison and truly embrace what the universe has given us.

What? My life is great! I never wanted to have kids, and neither did my partner. It's ok if you want kids, and it's totally ok if you don't.

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As they say, "there is no ethical consumption." I've done my part by not having any kids.

I could not imagine living with such a self hating attitude. Every day must be torture to wake up to. Why choose to live with this view of the world, I just don't get it. Life is beautiful. Children are incredible. I hope you break out of your self inflicted prison and truly embrace what the universe has given us.

> Why choose

Probably didnt

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We get what we deserve. We let the top 1% destroy our planet and also let them live the longest in their bunkers, while we deal with the repercussions of not having done enough. But I've noticed that folks on HN are very very fond of capitalism, so it's no point arguing against it on here and on the effects of wealth accumulation and greed.

The planet is fine friend. The cool thing about the relentless march of technology is that we will eventually fix anything we break along the way. There is no limit to what we can achieve. There is certainly nothing you can do about it so go outside, lie by the pool or the ocean, enjoy life.

>is that we will eventually fix anything we break along the way

Thats the most dangerous thought one could have. Simply thinking "its okay because we can fix it later" leads to taking issues lightly and hoping that a fix is eventually discovered in time. We run out of time with climate change for example. There are no fixes.

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We get what we deserve. We let the top 1% destroy our planet and also let them live the longest in their bunkers, while we deal with the repercussions of not having done enough. But I've noticed that folks on HN are very very fond of capitalism, so it's no point arguing against it on here and on the effects of wealth accumulation and greed.

It's the bottom 99% who destroy the planet by not killing themselves.

You can always start the trend

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes yes socialism also made mistakes so capitalism must be better!!

I lived under both systems. Yeah, socialism was abandoned precisely because capitalism was better. By the 1980s, residents of Central Europe could quite clearly compare and saw that their western neighbours were richer, healthier and enjoyed cleaner air and water than those of the "Camp of Progress". Market economy + democracy beats top-down enforced utopian intellectual projects like a Marxist-Leninist state by a di…

You prefer capitalism because you live privileged and weigh short term wealth higher than long term effects of capitalism. Personally I'd much prefer not exploiting 3rd world countries to fund first world consumerism.

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe it’s never been done properly cause human nature will never allow it to be, e.g. it’s an ideology that’s incompatible with humanity. But surely there’s a more sane option than under regulated capitalism with a problematic wealth distribution and fucked up incentives that encourage short term profit at the expense of society, environment and all else?

then it's a terrible system to govern humans under. your system should work with human nature or it will never work. capitalism exploits greed to generate prosperity. socialism falls under greed. and no there's not a better solution, or at least it hasn't been found yet. if it was it'd still be a form of capitalism, not the other side of the spectrum. but we disagree on the effects of the current system. capitalism h…

> then it's a terrible system to govern humans under.

Agreed!

> capitalism exploits greed to generate prosperity.

Sadly without representation, that prosperity accumulates around the few that then don’t necessarily disperse it back into the economy but hoard it and lobby against taxes and workers’ rights etc.

From where I stand, both systems suck, just that regulated capitalism is more workable in the more socialist leaning nations from a human welfare perspective, like many of the ones in the EU. Ofc an economic powerhouse that does not make, not necessarily.

And then there’s corruption and various bureaucratic inefficiencies, which you’ll get to some degree in any system.

Post reply on HN