I've heard there's a service called PirateBay that offers movies free of DRM. Maybe people considering being Sony customers in the future should give it a try.
Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
71–80 of 313 posts
Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#72Wait, people trusted a corporation and got screwed?!? Why, that's...unheard of!(My wife, bless her, has "purchased" dozens of movies on amazon. I warned her that when the amazon wind changes, she may regret those purchases. I got the look.)
I understand where you are going with this, but it also feels incorrect to me to blame people innocently "buying" media from a $corporation. What are people to do if they want to stay on the non-pirate/legal side of this but also prevent being royally F-ed?
Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#73Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#74I really hope this leads to a class action that sets precedence, but I won't hold my breath or even consider whether that's even possible.
Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#75Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#76Ending the production of physical discs too. Ripe for disruption.
Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#77Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#78Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#79We need some kind of modern equivalent to the old proposed Digital Media Consumer's Rights Act but which protects people's rights to digital media they buy. These should never be sold and then taken away with no compensation like this. We need a law that forces companies to treat digital files the same as a physical purchase. They can't take it away and have to allow people to resell and loan out as well. And in case…
Re: Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's copyright infringement. They do not have the rights to distribute the movies.
Neither does Sony (anymore), apparently. They still sold them.
it is more immoral to sell something you can't legally "sell" (permanently and irrevocably transfer ownership of a product), than to pirate that content (which has no level of expected payment)