Live data from Hacker News

.self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

hccf.onmy.cloud

331–340 of 410 posts

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#331

The "one free domain per person" isn't the interesting part really - that will be hard to police unless domain name is a function of ID proof (avoids squatting). 0) The actual intersting part of a new TLD can be growing reputation by post-facto taking away a domain without recourse in case of squatting. Instead of adversarial takedowns (which produce false positives as noted), let anyone challenge an inactive domain…

#2, name matching valid government ID excludes trans people who have not yet legally changed their name. Same reason they can’t get a Meta Verified status, even if paying. Thanks technology for keeping things accessible to everyone!

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#332
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or domain ownership.

i don't like normalizing people hoarding things they don't need in order to sell them for way higher prices to other people that do, do you?

What if it's a domain I just don't want anybody to use?

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#333
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend almost failed an IT class because his website didn't render at all in IE6. This was during the time of IE9. The teacher just hadn't updated their browser in a long time. I don't get how you get to be an IT teacher without knowing the most basic troubleshooting steps to get assignments to run.

I left community college after a week because my "computer" teacher required us to change our monitors to 640x480 and print out ever step that we completed in things like Notepad or Configuring the Desktop and then every day we'd punch it out and would add it to a three ring binder of all the things we've done. Full Color.

640x480 in 16 colors is the resolution as it was prescribed in the Bible.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#334

I'm just being a negative nancy here, but I don't think I'd want to advertise that any of my sites are specifically self hosted, in that it kinda asks for ... security probing, since it's more likely than not got less than professional security surrounding it. Having said that gestures to the entirety of the internet So maybe not such a big deal.

Why not? Surely you’re putting a cdn in-front of it still.

Tell me you don't know when a CDN is needed without telling me you don't know when a CDN is needed

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#335
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend almost failed an IT class because his website didn't render at all in IE6. This was during the time of IE9. The teacher just hadn't updated their browser in a long time. I don't get how you get to be an IT teacher without knowing the most basic troubleshooting steps to get assignments to run.

I assume this was at a highschool and not at university? My IT teacher in highschool was the chemistry teacher, because.. he knew how to use Word, I guess? He knew we were computer nerds so didn't really care about teaching us (we knew more than him anyway). And we didn't mind that he just sat there drinking coffee and reading a book, as it meant we could just play videogames for an hour. Good times.

[deleted]

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#336
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I left community college after a week because my "computer" teacher required us to change our monitors to 640x480 and print out ever step that we completed in things like Notepad or Configuring the Desktop and then every day we'd punch it out and would add it to a three ring binder of all the things we've done. Full Color.

640x480 in 16 colors is the resolution as it was prescribed in the Bible.

Amen

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#337
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend almost failed an IT class because his website didn't render at all in IE6. This was during the time of IE9. The teacher just hadn't updated their browser in a long time. I don't get how you get to be an IT teacher without knowing the most basic troubleshooting steps to get assignments to run.

Heh…I once was in a state-level coding event (it was a small portion of a larger competition) where half of the test was turning in code on a CD during the competition, with the written half during the event. My CD was deemed unusable for whatever reason (it had worked on XP and Fedora 6 or 7 at home) and didn't count towards my score. I still got second in the event. I declined to continue because I couldn't trust t…

Perfect attendance is not a good goal to aspire to. Kids force themselves (or get forced by parents) to go to school while sick, which is probably bad for their health and also risks everybody else's health.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#338

Remember when the .tk TLD became free 20 years ago ? Every hobbyist took one, then scammers followed, then Facebook and antiviruses started blocking it. I remember publishing a website for a class on my .tk domain, the teacher couldn't open it and I almost got a failing grade because of it.

Wow this brought back a flood of memories. I'll never forget spinning up lycos and geocity sites with .tk domains

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#339
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We can get creative. quick ideas: Send it by printed post. pass it around people to people. an email needs to be added in with some process, and can only get one TXT update value a week. Many ways of adding friction to obtaining the updatable value - which a human owning a domain would be happy to do, but a squatter would not want to.

> Send it by printed post that's how one of my local companies tries to force clients in. They removed auth code from their web panels and introduced complex snail-mail procedure. That was clear signal to run, but it took me 6 months to do just the domain transfer.

> We will send you an auth code via paper mail. The code expires in 30 minutes.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#340

Remember when the .tk TLD became free 20 years ago ? Every hobbyist took one, then scammers followed, then Facebook and antiviruses started blocking it. I remember publishing a website for a class on my .tk domain, the teacher couldn't open it and I almost got a failing grade because of it.

those were the days!!
Post reply on HN