Live data from Hacker News

.self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

hccf.onmy.cloud

201–210 of 410 posts

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#201

I'm just being a negative nancy here, but I don't think I'd want to advertise that any of my sites are specifically self hosted, in that it kinda asks for ... security probing, since it's more likely than not got less than professional security surrounding it. Having said that gestures to the entirety of the internet So maybe not such a big deal.

My initial thought as well, so you're no outlier, unless we are.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#202
post #181

The "one free domain per person" isn't the interesting part really - that will be hard to police unless domain name is a function of ID proof (avoids squatting). 0) The actual intersting part of a new TLD can be growing reputation by post-facto taking away a domain without recourse in case of squatting. Instead of adversarial takedowns (which produce false positives as noted), let anyone challenge an inactive domain…

Sounds like a bad domain for self hosting. You have to update txt records randomly and your domain can be taken for whatever reason. Whatever value you build goes away if you are inactive. You cannot transfer ownership killing any value you added.

Hence the "in the first year or two". Some more human effort to showcase proof early on, then the domain is solidified for you like iwth any other registrar. This is something like captcha/bcrypt - a single instance isn't a burden, but doing it at scale is costly.

> You cannot transfer ownership killing any value you added

I think this is by design. The domain should be for personal use - hence free.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#203

I'm just being a negative nancy here, but I don't think I'd want to advertise that any of my sites are specifically self hosted, in that it kinda asks for ... security probing, since it's more likely than not got less than professional security surrounding it. Having said that gestures to the entirety of the internet So maybe not such a big deal.

Why not? Surely you’re putting a cdn in-front of it still.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The .ai TLD is some tiny island with a few thousand people

.io is (British) Indian Ocean (Territory).

I always thought these TLDs were a flight risk to be used in any serious capacity. What if the random state decides you/your business are in violation of [whatever] and kick you off?

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#205
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please. Universities have students by the short and curlies. They can academically do basically whatever they want, and fail you for not complying. Professors can even demand their book be purchased, and fail for not buying the book. Most universities are unethical shitholes that can do basically whatever they want to gatekeep a diploma.

It’s getting so bad. My wife is in a remote school where they fail students occasionally to squeeze a little extra $$ out of them.

I’m sorry your wife failed some classes, but it’s probably not because the school wants some extra money.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#206

The "one free domain per person" isn't the interesting part really - that will be hard to police unless domain name is a function of ID proof (avoids squatting). 0) The actual intersting part of a new TLD can be growing reputation by post-facto taking away a domain without recourse in case of squatting. Instead of adversarial takedowns (which produce false positives as noted), let anyone challenge an inactive domain…

I dislike the term “domain squatting”. It should be called “domain scalping”.

Or domain ownership.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#207
States could grant such domains when individuals register their identity, for example, "klaus-mueller-.self". It runs on a VPS, and it is well documented how to create and run a website on that. School kids are introduced to it. Would be an excellent entry point into digital sovereignty for citizens.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#208

Remember when the .tk TLD became free 20 years ago ? Every hobbyist took one, then scammers followed, then Facebook and antiviruses started blocking it. I remember publishing a website for a class on my .tk domain, the teacher couldn't open it and I almost got a failing grade because of it.

Core memory unlocked Not enough allowance to fund a .com domain, had to use freenom / tk + cloudflare for my first years of self hosting

In my case, ignorance unlocked. I never heard of tk and I remember 36k modems so old enough.

I think reason is I went to work, slung .NET and didn't think much about computers otherwise except occasional reading some C++ books for "fun".

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#209
post #9

Shotgun on your.self! That’s going to yield a ton of great second level sub domains :)

We are probably going to reserve some of the more obvious ones for specific purposes, e.g. my.self automatically pointing to a homepage on your local network. As we go through the gTLD evaluation process we will be keen to solicit feedback from the community on more specifics!

[deleted]

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dislike the term “domain squatting”. It should be called “domain scalping”.

Or domain ownership.

It isn't scalping if your actually using it. It's easy to spot a scalping site since its just an advertisement to buy the domain.
Post reply on HN