I have taken another look on these open models after the fiasco of Fable and GPT 5.6 this weekend and... GLM-5.2 truly is a good workhorse model for daily programming. I consider myself a heavy user of LLMs and a seasoned developer. A typical session for me with GPT is usually over a hundred dollars... This weekend I programmed a matrix bot with encryption and a Rust agent with some tools. Because I need one and Open…
GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
151–160 of 559 posts
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#152Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
It also means giving up vision which I don't know how I would deal with. I think I would prefer a weaker model with vision than a stronger without.
If you using opencode or similar you can just temporarily switch models -- in the same session -- to something that has vision and have it look at your image. And then switch back.
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#154Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#155I tried GLM many times and it is bad, i have on clue what these people are talking about
Now I feel like that I'm covered by GLM 5.2 and Minimax M3 (when I need vision or a second pass on something).
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’d be restrictions on Americans and American companies, and probably also pressure on America’s allies.
Token smuggler sounds like a profession coming soon. For distillation and stuff.
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Im really curious about this. Why pay API pricing? I burn 1000s of dollars a month of api according to claude usage but only pay the $100 subscription
My increasing frustration with these plans is the harness lock in. Anthropic won't even let you run "claude -p [prompt]" any more... They bill it at api rates. So if you're trying to automate the ai (and seriously, that's the point) the subsidized plans are crippled.
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#158Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
Im really curious about this. Why pay API pricing? I burn 1000s of dollars a month of api according to claude usage but only pay the $100 subscription
My increasing frustration with these plans is the harness lock in. Anthropic won't even let you run "claude -p [prompt]" any more... They bill it at api rates. So if you're trying to automate the ai (and seriously, that's the point) the subsidized plans are crippled.
> In May, we sent you an email announcing that starting today, the Claude Agent SDK, claude -p, and third-party apps built on the Agent SDK would stop drawing from subscription rate limits and move to a dedicated monthly credit. We're writing to let you know that we’re not making this change today. We’re working to update the plan to better support how users build with Claude subscriptions.
> What this means for you
> Nothing changes for now. Agent SDK, claude -p, and third-party app usage continues to work with your subscription exactly as it did before today, and there's no credit to claim. Your subscription limits are unchanged. When we have an update, we'll share it with advance notice before it takes effect
Re: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be extremely heavy handed but the administration has sanctioned the International Criminal Court judges such that they basically have no access to the Wests modern financial system. I think domestic US providers would have to deal with different ways but someone like Herzner could easily be cut off from the financial system if the administration doesn't feel that they are adequately blocking the model
Swapping the footgun for a huge long-range boomerang doesn’t mean it’s not going to eventually swing around and whack you in the back of the head.