Live data from Hacker News

U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

semafor.com

571–580 of 873 posts

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#571

If this becomes the norm, what incentive does the rest of the world have to keep their markets open to the US? If US companies have a large unfair advantage such that domestic competitors are no longer able to compete, then wouldn't it make sense for governments around the world to ban or tariff US products and services? If I was responsible for national economic policy, I would place this at the top of my non-emerge…

It might not be a coincidence that POTUS wrote yesterday on Truth Social that 100% tariffs would be imposed on any country proceeding with taxing US' digital services.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#572
post #562

If this becomes the norm, what incentive does the rest of the world have to keep their markets open to the US? If US companies have a large unfair advantage such that domestic competitors are no longer able to compete, then wouldn't it make sense for governments around the world to ban or tariff US products and services? If I was responsible for national economic policy, I would place this at the top of my non-emerge…

The US as a large-scale import nation and so does not need the rest of the world (except perhaps Europe, and only small parts) to keep its markets open to the US. Even in the European case, Europe would lose much more than the US would if they closed their markets. Plus, a lot of Europe is either very close to breaking point and unwilling to change (Italy), or rapidly worsening into a crash, and unwilling to change (…

I think this is a bit too deterministic. Even if Europe is in a weak position economically, "the US does not need the rest of the world" seems overstated

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#573

Earlier quoted context omitted.

famously friendly business environments europe & canada lol

Well, as long as you stick to the rules you can do business in Europe and it can't be taken away from you. As long as you are in the US? No one protects you. Asset forfeiture, arbitrary sanctions, arbitrary tariffs, your employees can get arrested and deported right off the street if they happen to have non-white skin and live in a city under siege by ICE, and if you oppose the regime or just dare to not kiss the rin…

[flagged]

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#574

If this becomes the norm, what incentive does the rest of the world have to keep their markets open to the US? If US companies have a large unfair advantage such that domestic competitors are no longer able to compete, then wouldn't it make sense for governments around the world to ban or tariff US products and services? If I was responsible for national economic policy, I would place this at the top of my non-emerge…

Is the rest of the world really that dependent on emerging AI? I don’t think so. The US could cut off all foreign access to AI, nobody would notice.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#575
post #154

Don't start to rely on it . The US might remove access next month in a fit of pique. The Chinese models look increasingly more reliable and safer.

This is a pithy internet comment, but terrible advice. Between the Chinese government and Anthropic, I know which one I'd rather send tokens to. For all of the problems of the US, for-profit corporations, data harvesting, etc. the CCP (and, perhaps more troublesome, its allies) is far less likely to align with your interests.

Not worshipping Jesus and his earthly apostle Trump is in my country's interest though.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#576
post #510
post #466

I’m on record saying mistral needs 50B euros asap; I’ll admit this was wrong, they need more sooner

To do what exactly? They have been nothing but EU funds leech and corporiders. Every single model is (and always was) behind anything from China. I wish Europe could find one company that can put us on the map but Mistral’s not it. They have repeatedly shown that extra funding doesn’t magically transfer to better models.

> Every single model is (and always was) behind anything from China.

My guess is, that Mistral plays fair and doesn't try to extract data from US models, while Chinese companies are not.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#577

If this becomes the norm, what incentive does the rest of the world have to keep their markets open to the US? If US companies have a large unfair advantage such that domestic competitors are no longer able to compete, then wouldn't it make sense for governments around the world to ban or tariff US products and services? If I was responsible for national economic policy, I would place this at the top of my non-emerge…

Is the rest of the world really that dependent on emerging AI? I don’t think so. The US could cut off all foreign access to AI, nobody would notice.

It would definitely be a problem. A big one. Think of all the multi-national tech companies that have rolled out AI not only to their engineering teams but to their business teams now too. Suddenly your employees in the US can do more and do it quicker than your employees elsewhere. It would be a nightmare to try and manage.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#578
post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Technically the US government is allowing Anthropic to serve the models to any US citizen, and it's Anthropic who decided that's impossible to comply with It is technically impossible. Many of the researchers working on the models aren't US citizens. That's not just within Anthropic. It'd make things 100% worse.

Lockheed Martin is able to restrict access of their product details to only us citizens. It's not impossible, it's just hard.

There are tens of thousands of defense contractors that not only work with export-controlled stuff, but even top-secret and other higher levels.

Getting just a secret clearance takes up to a year, and expecting to do this for all employees, in this AI market? Not going to happen, things move way too fast.

People complain about the US approach, but almost every high end manufacturing is being export controlled, from ASML machines to high end optic used in missiles.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, as long as you stick to the rules you can do business in Europe and it can't be taken away from you. As long as you are in the US? No one protects you. Asset forfeiture, arbitrary sanctions, arbitrary tariffs, your employees can get arrested and deported right off the street if they happen to have non-white skin and live in a city under siege by ICE, and if you oppose the regime or just dare to not kiss the rin…

[flagged]

Hi I'm from Europe and I'm about to start my second business. I don't have friends in high places, and the process is entirely online and takes about an hour to complete followed by 1-5 weeks of waiting for tax approval etc.

Pro tip: most American anti-Europe propaganda is propaganda.

Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

#580
post #458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's huge incentive. The government has arbitrary commandeered their business. This could ruin Anthropic. They are walking a tight rope with respect to revenues, hype, IPO. If this kills their hyper growth prospects, it could kill the IPO. If there's a serious change the gov. is out of line, the judges could put a stay and possibly throw this out. There may however be enough of a case, in which there's maybe not m…

The government, once they see realized potential, will print money and give it to Anthropic if that’s what’s needed to keep developing the technology with gated access.

Just replace the word Anthropic with defense contractor or weapons manufacturer, they’re all export controlled at this point, do you see a difference?

I really hope the controls are relaxed, but at some arbitrary levels it’s expected that all countries will apply export controls.

Post reply on HN