I don't see the issue. Didn't Anthropic train on our data, which it acquired illegally?
Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
261–270 of 1001 posts
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. Yeah, like all those Chinese bootleggers selling DVDs for a few dollars rather than $20. Free market! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814
"Information wants to be free" Anthropic profited from training its models on all kinds of copyrighted information, live by the sword, die by the sword... Their model weights, training data, training methods, etc are all going to leak to China over time. Nobody on a site named _Hacker_ news should be all that upset about this.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#263This is a bit ironic, Anthropic complaining about a competitor using claude data to build its own product when Anthropic basically used all of human knowledge production to build claude, i don't think they paid every magazine, author, journalist, etc ... This is almost standard practice in any competitive industry anyways. Disassemble your competitor's product, study it and try to reproduce / improve.
Ironically, it's likely that the only reason USG let them get away with this — instead of making obvious and necessary adjustments to copyright law — was so that the industry would remain competitive with China.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#264Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#265This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. I also learnt that Anthropic should get better at what they do if they want to compete. If not, somebody else will win. Or does this not apply to huge US corporations any more?
>This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. Yeah, like all those Chinese bootleggers selling DVDs for a few dollars rather than $20. Free market! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess you missed the fraud part.
>Fraud According to which lawyer caste? Are American laws absolute truth? If not, who cares?
> 3. At an Italian airport: Constantly stealing bags, opening them to pick out MacBooks and credit cards, a credit card manufacturer-who sells stolen "black" credit card info to transfer stations— is racking his brains to save you money.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the idea that the Chinese are better at selling US models than the Americans is hilarious This is not the right deduction. China blocks foreign AI from operating there.
I think you will find that it's the USA government imposing such restrictions.
Chinese AI apps like DeepSeek are freely available for ordinary Americans to download and use. There's no federal law banning private citizens from using them.
So to claim that Chinese companies are better at selling American companies' work than the American companies can do themselves when they are prohibited from operating in that market, is the wrong deduction to make.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#268This is a bit ironic, Anthropic complaining about a competitor using claude data to build its own product when Anthropic basically used all of human knowledge production to build claude, i don't think they paid every magazine, author, journalist, etc ... This is almost standard practice in any competitive industry anyways. Disassemble your competitor's product, study it and try to reproduce / improve.
Anthropic did pay $1.5B to authors. But yes, it would be much better if they paid everyone on the internet dividends from every Claude chat. Or released Claude as an open model. In practice, the former isn't very realistic, while the latter is politically dead as this is becoming a national security issue.
And paying basically everyone online is more or less a solved problem, it's what ad agencies have to do every day.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. Yeah, like all those Chinese bootleggers selling DVDs for a few dollars rather than $20. Free market! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814
"Information wants to be free" Anthropic profited from training its models on all kinds of copyrighted information, live by the sword, die by the sword... Their model weights, training data, training methods, etc are all going to leak to China over time. Nobody on a site named _Hacker_ news should be all that upset about this.
Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup, it's hard to take seriously any complaint about "stealing" Anthropic's services, when their entire business is based on massive theft.
You should. Companies like this will inevitably try and pull the ladder up behind them.