Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

reuters.com

221–230 of 1001 posts

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#221
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats pretty crazy. This kind of thing jeopardizes Claude Max.

If Anthropic is selling a dollar for less than a dollar, they are running a business that doesn't make sense. That's what jeopardizes Claude Max, not this.

[dead]

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#222

This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. I also learnt that Anthropic should get better at what they do if they want to compete. If not, somebody else will win. Or does this not apply to huge US corporations any more?

[flagged]

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#223

Distillation is fundamentally impossible to protect against. All you can do is slow them down. Change my view. Eventually these Chinese companies will release some extension like Honey, which will sit on top real, non-Chinese clients and send everything to China anyway. It's over.

Doesn’t that require them to register an account using the browsers they’ve compromised? If anthropic adds identity verification won’t that cut that down. Maybe it will let them use Gemini inside of chrome

Residential IPs don’t even matter. Developers use devboxes, use Claude Code CLI on servers from just about every cloud, etc.

There’s probably a decent volume of customers who just buy Claude Max and spend most if not nearly all of their sessions via Claude Code, and it’s not uncommon for power users to be working on multiple concurrent projects/tasks/codebases at the same time.

How do you really block this without also impacting your core market of developers?

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#224

Here's what is happening: Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices. They achieve this by reselling capacity from pooled Claude Max accounts, payments fraud, and also reselling the model output & reasoning chains to various Chinese labs. They are subsidizing model access in exchange for user logs and reasoning traces, which they then sell as training data, allowing the…

One would think Anthropic could point Mythos at this to solve the reseller problem outright:

- Purchase multiple accounts via resellers

- Send messages that contain a UID

- Capture these in Anthropic's logs

- Shut down account. Use any metadata to identify related accounts

/loop

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#225
post #220

Here's what is happening: Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices. They achieve this by reselling capacity from pooled Claude Max accounts, payments fraud, and also reselling the model output & reasoning chains to various Chinese labs. They are subsidizing model access in exchange for user logs and reasoning traces, which they then sell as training data, allowing the…

Somebody figured out how to make the trial profitable! I don't really feel bad about anyone here, they were subsidizing to get people hooked, someone turned the subsidies into profit when they got selective pricing mode enabled, it was always going to be arbitrage. But the winner is the guy in the middle in a jurisdiction that will likely be judgement proof, because everything they capture, both input and out, and if…

I don’t follow your reasoning. It is foreign to me. You talk about winners, but this is clearly fraud.

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn’t that require them to register an account using the browsers they’ve compromised? If anthropic adds identity verification won’t that cut that down. Maybe it will let them use Gemini inside of chrome

No, they could easily buy legitimate, already registered accounts and use VPNs.

Why use VPNs? Just use a public cloud like AWS, or something like Linode and Vultr and all that.

Developers use devboxes on these clouds all the time, it’s totally normal behavior.

Most people buying these Chinese resold tokens are probably using it for coding anyway, so you don’t want the Claude.ai chat system prompt.

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#227

This is a bit ironic, Anthropic complaining about a competitor using claude data to build its own product when Anthropic basically used all of human knowledge production to build claude, i don't think they paid every magazine, author, journalist, etc ... This is almost standard practice in any competitive industry anyways. Disassemble your competitor's product, study it and try to reproduce / improve.

Ironically, it's likely that the only reason USG let them get away with this — instead of making obvious and necessary adjustments to copyright law — was so that the industry would remain competitive with China.

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#228

This is a bit ironic, Anthropic complaining about a competitor using claude data to build its own product when Anthropic basically used all of human knowledge production to build claude, i don't think they paid every magazine, author, journalist, etc ... This is almost standard practice in any competitive industry anyways. Disassemble your competitor's product, study it and try to reproduce / improve.

Yup, it's hard to take seriously any complaint about "stealing" Anthropic's services, when their entire business is based on massive theft.

You should. Companies like this will inevitably try and pull the ladder up behind them.

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#229
post #140

This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. I also learnt that Anthropic should get better at what they do if they want to compete. If not, somebody else will win. Or does this not apply to huge US corporations any more?

>This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. Yeah, like all those Chinese bootleggers selling DVDs for a few dollars rather than $20. Free market! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814

The output of Claude is not eligible for copyright protection. I'm not sure how the analogy of bootlegging DVDs would work, given that.

Re: Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities

#230

This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. I also learnt that Anthropic should get better at what they do if they want to compete. If not, somebody else will win. Or does this not apply to huge US corporations any more?

Do you also think Chinese selling counterfeit US postage stamps on eBay for 50% retail price (which is a major problem CBP and USPIS are fighting presently) is the free market at work? This post is so delusional and dripping with condescension I've read it three times and I still can't figure out if you're trolling or not.

Postage stamps have specific legal protection from duplication. The output of an LLM is not itself eligible for any legal IP protection.
Post reply on HN