Will It Mythos?
41–50 of 232 posts
Re: Will It Mythos?
#42Re: Will It Mythos?
#43In my brief experience, the difference between fable and opus is largely in persistence, not global intelligence like you might expect. Fable just... goes the extra mile, sometimes in a scary way.
Perhaps it is a lot of small improvements all over the place, but the sum is a step change in capability.
Re: Will It Mythos?
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hard disagree. Opus reports to me like a student. Fable reported to me like a colleague (researcher). It genuinely seemed to pick up on nuance that the other models just don't, even when I tell them explicitly. It's been really frustrating that neither Codex nor Opus can make targetted edits to Fable's code without screwing something subtle up. For context, this is for computational geometry work, so your mileage may…
> It's been really frustrating that neither Codex nor Opus can make targetted edits to Fable's code without screwing something subtle up. Reminds me of the old adage: don't try to be too smart when writing code. Otherwise, dumber people - including your future self - will have trouble working with it.
Re: Will It Mythos?
#45Surprise.. someone downplaying Mythos/Fable that didn't actually use it. Plenty of comments here to the contrary, including my own personal experience with Fable was easily a step change in capability over Opus - figuring things out in reverse engineering binaries that Opus plain couldn't find.
Re: Will It Mythos?
#46Re: Will It Mythos?
#47Re: Will It Mythos?
#48Re: Will It Mythos?
#49Could someone point the thing at Ventoy please?