Good. Fuck Cloudflare and other internet gatekeepers. Confuse their signal as much as possible.
Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
111–120 of 189 posts
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#11212 minute article. 70% AI. The only content not flagged? Copy and pasted PR comments. Invisible Unicode characters, triads, unnecessary markdown. Good work, obviated by bloviating. Readers dropping off near-instantly. A company leaving a slop trail behind its wake. AI DDOSing should be shameful. https://www.folklore.org/Saving_Lives.html
It’s exhausting. It’s like every article is written by the same author and that author is also your coworker and personal assistant and also moonlights as Brian, a waiter at Chotchkie’s.
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#11312 minute article. 70% AI. The only content not flagged? Copy and pasted PR comments. Invisible Unicode characters, triads, unnecessary markdown. Good work, obviated by bloviating. Readers dropping off near-instantly. A company leaving a slop trail behind its wake. AI DDOSing should be shameful. https://www.folklore.org/Saving_Lives.html
"The app goes away. The proxy does not."
"The app is the wrapper. The residential IP is the product."
Headers are very chatgpt style too:
"Why this is dangerous"The information in the article is valid and they've done the work to get the data, but the LLM style is irritating.
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#114Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. For instance, Bright Data describes itself, on its home page, as the "all in one platform for proxies and web scraping".
From the article it can be used by botnets as well, linking to https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/01/the-kimwolf-botnet-is-st...
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. Why not just get a (presumably subsidized) smart TV instead, and skipping the premium? It'd also be not disconnected from the internet, and despite vague HN/reddit speculation that TVs have cell modems in them, that has yet to be confirmed.
If you do this, connect it to the internet at least once, because most smart TVs ship with missing features that aren't activated until you do a firmware update.
Kinda on the opposite recommendation that the fw it shipped with had to meet SOME minimally functional bar and every update after that is an opportunity to make it worse.
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#117Never ever connect your "Smart"-TV to your network, or if you have an incurable impulse to then make sure it's on a firewalled gateway-less VLAN. Take the money you save buying the thing (compared to what a profitable "dumb" version would cost) and buy a surplus corporate mini-workstation system, and slap LibreELEC/Kodi or whatever on it, and use that device as your "smart" device. No good for you can ever come from…
The only time mine were ever connected to the internet was to update the software, and for that the easiest thing I thought was to host a temporary wifi hotspot (using a phone).
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#118I'll get on my high horse and say you can get solid "DID/Commercial" TVs for not that much more: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1788343-REG/samsung_q... I got this a few months ago -- 4k, solid brightness, and ok color. Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. I use it with an apple TV with CEC on the TV -- I turn on the apple tv, TV turns on straight to apple interface. I tu…
That looks like The Frame from Samsung. Does it have a matte surface? What version of Tizen is it running? Does it have API access?
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. Why not just get a (presumably subsidized) smart TV instead, and skipping the premium? It'd also be not disconnected from the internet, and despite vague HN/reddit speculation that TVs have cell modems in them, that has yet to be confirmed.
I wanted more control and no UI. The commercial ones do that -- I think this was like $150 more than the "samsung smart ui" one... Never seeing a smart TV interface was worth that for me. YMMV.
While I have WiFi disabled on the TV, I do like that I can still hook up a broadcast TV antenna and have the TV scan for channels and all that, which Apple TV can’t do
Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs
#120It's not Smart TV apps specifically, it's all free apps. They have to monetize those somehow, don't they? And you get upset when you see ads, don't you? Basically it's either this or pay for your apps.
> Basically it's either this or pay for your apps. And then paid apps show you ads and monetize anyway.
If you are paying for the product, you're still the product.
Indeed, if you're a paying customer, there's more incentive to push ads at you, not less, since you obviously have more money to spend. The only winning move is not to p(l)ay.