Earlier quoted context omitted.
Name it something really confusing like... Linuxtablet
Or, as is tradition, something stupid like “the gimp” or “go”.
Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
51–60 of 129 posts
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#52> Well, because it's true: many of the repositories are named after "Wacom". It's a historical legacy on GNU/Linux. It's also a decade-long debate that these repos should be renamed differently. If the project being named after Wacom is actively causing other companies to not contribute because they believe it’s a Wacom lead project and they’d be helping a competitor, I don’t understand why this is even a debate vs.…
Yes. It feels like the article was leading towards a reason for not doing that, but then suddenly it just ends.
And besides once you start your tablet for Linux Projekt you have to touch everything, so that is a nice opportunity to finally refactor the wacom_debug_2 mess and pretty soon you're drowning in yak shavings.
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#53Could AI do it? Would it work to give the Windows driver to an LLM and tell it to analyze it and write a Linux driver?
Maybe people don't realize that this is very much within the capabilities of modern AI nowadays?
At $dayjob we have encountered people reverse engineering our driver with Claude and creating GitHub repos with pretty useful vibecoded tools and documentation.
Yes, the raw binaries of the driver. Not leaked source code or anything like that.
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#54Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#55Besides Wacom, which tablets would you recommend as good quality?
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#56One thing I miss from Windows is the tablet driver GUI. "cinnamon-settings wacom" doesn't let me map buttons to keys (important for software like FireAlpaca, which pans with the space key instead of supporting the middle mouse button like everybody else in the planet), and it also doesn't let me remap the tablet area to arbitrary screen coordinates. These are things I could do on Windows that I can't do through the G…
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#57> Well, because it's true: many of the repositories are named after "Wacom". It's a historical legacy on GNU/Linux. It's also a decade-long debate that these repos should be renamed differently. Okay... let's rename them then? I know it's silly, but, well, we've went through the whole pointless `master` -> `main` branch rename in so many projects which was much more disruptive -- at least this one could serve a purpo…
I find it interesting that you think this rename serves a purpose when the master to main rename does not. Neither change has any technical reason. The only reason why either name change was desired is because some contributors were upset by the names.
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#58Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
You didn't hear the foaming at the mouth shouting to rename master recordings, master documents, or dub over The Master from Dr. Who. Considering how much effort we had to out into fixing pipelines because of hardcoded scripts, and the lack of good reason to do it its no surprise that it was scoffed at. White keyboard warriors needed to make a change, but couldn't do anything meaningful as it would require actually d…
I thought the purpose of the rename was to encourage these contributions that apparently weren't happening because of the branch name? It certainly helped GNOME whom was one of the biggest proponents /s
Re: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers
#60> Well, because it's true: many of the repositories are named after "Wacom". It's a historical legacy on GNU/Linux. It's also a decade-long debate that these repos should be renamed differently. If the project being named after Wacom is actively causing other companies to not contribute because they believe it’s a Wacom lead project and they’d be helping a competitor, I don’t understand why this is even a debate vs.…
Its most likely a debate because making such a major refactoring effort is actually a heavy work load, there are lots of bits and pieces to tie together and cut out and so on, and the folks capable of shepherding this change through all the parties out into the distro's are already underpaid/under-appreciated too much as it is .. Hopefully, this situation will get some traction with a bit of noise about it, and the d…