Live data from Hacker News

Identity verification on Claude

support.claude.com

581–590 of 765 posts

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#581

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surprised there isn't a "Fake Face" market like a mannequin face delivered to your door.

The latest ones make you smile, shut eyes / wink, look up, down, etc. plus for Apple they use the lidar and the IR camera for heat.

Not everyone has a device that can use lidar to map the face so it can’t be a requirement.

Kids have been defeating these smile and close your eyes things using photo mode in video games to control a character to perform the actions.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#582
post #578

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I’m a US citizen and absolutely will not be uploading additional information just to use a company’s models. I can't speak to your specific use of Anthropic's models, but I find it interesting that people will identify themselves (to set up and pay for an account) and provide all sorts of personal (and often sensitive if not confidential) information to these models on a daily basis, but balk at a 5-minute identity…

It’s not the five minutes that I balk at, it’s entrusting a third party with all they need to steal my identity. But of course, they’ll never get hacked…

It's not like Anthropic is the only company in the world that would have the basic details contained on a driver's license or passport. Odds are all of the PII required for someone to steal your identity is already in criminal hands.

The National Public Data breach alone exposed the social security numbers of potentially upwards of 100 million Americans. Numerous companies have literally "all" of your personal data and you never did business with them/gave it to them directly.

It's not right but the identity theft cat is out of the bag, which is why precautions like credit freezes, are recommended for all Americans.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#583

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Pointless CYA They are literally being forced to do this by the government. The counter-ask if for them to self immolate in order to take a principled stand, as access to all their models is banned.

Or move to Europe/China/insert lovely tax haven here. They don't have to base their operations in the USA, they CHOOSE to. I will cancel my subscription because of this, and happily use DeepSeek/mimo or whatever else comes for a fraction of the cost. China won't and mostly can't do anything with my data, the US government can and certainly will. I'll pick my poison thanks and choose Chinese surveillance.

> I'll pick my poison thanks and choose Chinese surveillance.

Assuming they won’t trade or sell it back to the US or whoever?

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#584

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a decent moderation, shadowban is a totally different thing. AFAIK, your karma is enough to vouch that Flagged topics or comments and return that piece into a regular displaying.

There's no difference between shadowban and moderation, shadowban is a moderation tool.

Shadowban and community-driven moderation are different poles. Former is a tool of shallow narcisses, latter is the best moderation strategy possible in the clearnet. Come on, commenter.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#586

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s tough to separate with them because “for the greater good” and “saving people from themselves” has historically not gone over well, especially when we all know it’s a veneer and get cold blooded capitalism.

Seems to work pretty well at keeping people from playing around with anthrax and fully automatic weapons.

Dunno about anthrax, but fully automated weapons are really easy to come by.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#587

The US is really shooting itself in the foot here. The restrictions on LLM models like Fable has created a viable international LLM market where it was difficult to justify investment two weeks ago. As a non-US citizen Opus 4.8 is the best American LLM I will ever have access to. That's no longer up for debate or question. Each month that I pay Anthropic is now a depreciating value -- I'm paying for models I'll never…

I also think this makes OpenAI and Anthropic even less viable. They're tens of billions in debt, losing money every month, have data center commitments in the hundreds of billions, and now they're reducing their market to the US? The only way this can work is with substantial government subsidies.

And a fraction of the US market at that. Requiring ID scans and all of this nonsense to use a chatbot just added a whole layer of friction that many are going to just nope on out of and use one of the endless other services. I suppose the next step will be for the government to try to ban those other services once they mature and start booming.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#588
`Persona is contractually limited in how they can use your data: only to provide and support verification and to improve their ability to prevent fraud.`

Right.... So training a better facial recognition model improves their ability to prevent fraud?

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#589

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Existing setup. I'm already used to Claude Code I guess. I actually spent time and tokens customizing and fixing it. Have a patcher utility that modifies the binary in order to disable telemetry and remove performance reducing language in the system prompts. Every update I spend some Claude tokens dissecting the newest executable and integrating it with my patcher. The monthly subscription is also a major hurdle for…

Are you me? Anyway I wonder if you've played with the following, they've been what I've been using to patch CC: https://github.com/skrabe/tweakcc-fixed https://github.com/skrabe/lobotomized-claude-code

Yeah I know about tweakcc, even had some custom prompts committed to my dotfiles repository for a while. For some reason it wasn't working for me, don't remember why.

At first I used this shell script here:

https://gist.github.com/roman01la/483d1db15043018096ac3babf5...

Someone posted it on HN on the Opus degradation thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660925

I just kept using it to fix the prompts for a long time. Eventually I asked Claude to port it to Python to make it easier to maintain. Now every month or so Claude dissects the Claude Code binary and integrates the script with the newest version.

https://github.com/matheusmoreira/.files/blob/master/%7E/.lo...

Post reply on HN