Live data from Hacker News

Identity verification on Claude

support.claude.com

331–340 of 765 posts

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#331
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know that this may sound surprising, but US is not the only country in the world ;)

My assumption was more that this is about getting set up to provide access to Fable to US citizens. I could be mistaken in that regard.

It probably is. But I don't trust personas funders (and the US gov, btw) to only use this data in this regard.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#332

The US is really shooting itself in the foot here. The restrictions on LLM models like Fable has created a viable international LLM market where it was difficult to justify investment two weeks ago. As a non-US citizen Opus 4.8 is the best American LLM I will ever have access to. That's no longer up for debate or question. Each month that I pay Anthropic is now a depreciating value -- I'm paying for models I'll never…

> As a non-US citizen

...

> My next step is exploring OpenRouter and other models

May I suggest using Cortecs.ai then? OpenRouter is US-based as well and since you have been bitten by this already perhaps it's really time to change course? :)

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If K2 or GLM 5.2 are on par with Opus 4.8 I'll eat my hat. They're good, but they're not that good. Deepseek V4 Pro has been better than Sonnet for me, but the only model that comes close to or surpasses Opus 4.8 is GPT-5.5.

Honestly just give it time. This stuff moves so fast next month the conversation will be different. For folks who don’t like the ID privacy issues, use Deepseek et al and it should be able to get the job done even if the experience takes a bit more wrangling. The problem with the ID verification is that they can pair introspective conversations with ID. Either that bothers people or it doesn’t. Main point: we can’t f…

I agree with this, my disagreement was strictly with saying that the current open models are as good as Opus.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you. This is an expansion of surveillance. Most concerning to me is how few people understand government's access to this data. People treat AI like a diary, and the government can request that data at anytime.

Indeed - Persona is backed by Founders Fund - also linked to lovely companies like Palantir, Flock & Anduril. Some people still (claim they) can’t see the massive dragnet swirling around all of society right now.

Many of the people that talk about the “massive dragnet swirling around” are posting all their details to social media and checking in on their Ring cameras, and they’re also volunteering for the persona uploads.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#336
post #9

Let us hope this only accelerates the proliferation of local models

Serving barely useful GLM 5.2 costs what? $15k? Actually useful is like $50k? You’ll never recoup the cost unless you ‘locally’ means ‘inference provider is not the model provider’?

glm-5.2 is available for $20/month on ollama.com and is IMHO more functional than the $200/month claude max subscription. you can even use the same claude harness [0]. You get about 20x more token usage at 10x less the price.

[0] https://ollama.com/library/glm-5.2

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you think the field you are working in is more dangerous and important to the future of national security than i.e. nuclear energy and nuclear bombs you should really not just shut up and act like a cold blooded capitalist. It feels like people here are not able to separate their personal dislike of the effective altruist types from a real debate on how big the stakes of AI are.

It’s tough to separate with them because “for the greater good” and “saving people from themselves” has historically not gone over well, especially when we all know it’s a veneer and get cold blooded capitalism.

> especially when we all know it’s a veneer and get cold blooded capitalism

This is what I don’t really get about the AI discourse… I don’t have any reason to think this is all a veneer over capitalism. We don’t know what goes on in their head but the track record of the cofounders of Anthropic is quite honest so it feels like a conspiracy theory to suggest they are purposefully getting themselves nationalized when the simplest answer is that there is real documented concern on AI safety risk

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#338

I am not sure what is the purpose of this. If you are paying with a credit card, they already have your fully verified identity through the bank's KYC, fully protecting Anthropic legally. Corporate accounts, in the US, will have full personal identification through the corresponding company's HR.

Prepaid credit cards with cash would not be linked to your identity.

Re: Identity verification on Claude

#340
post #312

Cancelled. Anthropic can get bent if it wants to market itself as the ethical AI choice and at the same time lies in bed with those openly pushing for a surveillance state.

Agreed, this is crazy, and is exactly why the administration did what it did. However, every frontier model will require this within months.

You're right. I want to say that openai is a viable alternative, but they're even less trustworthy.

It might be time for me to start looking into Chinese models or purchasing hardware for local llms, even if the cost amounts to 5-10k.

Post reply on HN