Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
51–60 of 550 posts
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s that wages have not risen with inflation.
Aside from less than a quarter point (0.24) from Covid, wages have in fact risen with inflation and that small difference is also likely to disppear soon. https://usafacts.org/answers/are-wages-keeping-up-with-infla... It is in fact rents, especially with mandatory add-ons. The actual cost of renting a place is a lot more than the direct rent payment.
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#53Henry George was right about everything
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#54Landlords are the least productive class in society, and it's not even close in terms of ranking.
I guess it's time to abolish apartment buildings then. And how dare someone want to rent a house/condo/apartment when they only expect to live in a city for a couple years.
Landlords do not manage properties. Property managers do that. Property managers should get more reward for managing properties and landlords should get less.
Sometimes these are the same individuals and they lump their fees into a single check, but these are not the same jobs and they should not be treated the same.
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 1970 a $300/month apartment would be ~$2000/month in today dollars. I do think rents are too high as productivity and supply chains are much more efficient. I think in the 70s we were still using black pipe for gas, iron septic lines, and copper pipes for water. But, I don't think new builds or renovations are cheaper inflation adjusted (harder to estimate). Cost of money (inflation), building, and maintenance is…
How many apartments were $300/m in 1970?
Per state breakouts: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/ti...
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#56Wages in america are extremely high, its just property prices are even higher.
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 1970 a $300/month apartment would be ~$2000/month in today dollars. I do think rents are too high as productivity and supply chains are much more efficient. I think in the 70s we were still using black pipe for gas, iron septic lines, and copper pipes for water. But, I don't think new builds or renovations are cheaper inflation adjusted (harder to estimate). Cost of money (inflation), building, and maintenance is…
How many apartments were $300/m in 1970?
In the late 80s early 90s I was paying 350 USD for a 2 bedroom.
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#58Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#59Wages in america are extremely high, its just property prices are even higher.
Re: Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore
#60Again seeing some blaming poor immigrants for this in the very first answers. Meanwhile, where do the money for OpenAI and the SpaceX IPO comes from? Who got hold of so much money? How did they got hold of it? And here's the killer question: would they, and the rules and system supporting them, change in any way if there were less immigrants?
I’m sure many immigrants had money on the IPO as well?