Live data from Hacker News

GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

discuss.grapheneos.org

191–200 of 653 posts

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#191
post #186

I have always wondered what this OS looks like. They have an incredibly detailed website with zero screenshots.

There are numerous video walkthroughs of GrapheneOS. This would be one starting point:

https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=aNgupWEV13M>

Visually, it generally looks much like stock Android in terms of capabilities, though a stock install generally has far fewer apps installed.

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#192

What's the biggest draw of GrapheneOS apart from de-googling? Does it have a better battery life? And compliance with NFC payments?

It will depend on your banks/services. If those apps strictly implement Play Integrity API, you won't be able to use them on Graphene OS

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#194
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Presumably any new Android 17 features that aren't counter to GrapheneOS's mission, such as "Bubbles allows you to turn any app into a compact, floating window" https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android...

Does GrapheneOS run on tablets? I don't see a whole chat app (shown in the example) fitting on my phone screen alongside something like a web browser, and the screenshot is from a square screen

GrapheneOS runs on an extremely limited set of hardware, mostly Google's own Pixel phones.

There's a shot of GrapheneOS on a tablet just past the three-minute mark in this video. I suspect that's a Pixel tablet (of which thee are several), though I'm not certain and the video doesn't specify:

https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=aNgupWEV13M&t=188>]

Google Pixel tablet: https://store.google.com/us/product/pixel_tablet?hl=en-US>

Discussion on Reddit says Google Pixel and Pixel Fold are both supported (tablets): https://old.reddit.com/r/GrapheneOS/comments/16bp6e9/anyone_...>.

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#195
With Google making side loading extremely difficult soon, there's never been a better time to switch to a more secure OS for your phone.

There are some apps I can't do without like ReThink DNS, NewPipe and other open source apps which I use regularly. All would get blocked under Googles new regime.

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#197
post #6

So I still need to buy a Google phone to get it? No thank you.

To get a sense of the project and its goals I recommend reading this post[1]. Buying a used Pixel is economical, environmental, and likely doesn't support Google. Pixels are the only secure and open android devices that could work for the project and meet the extensive requirements[2]. This is because GrapheneOS takes real steps to protect user privacy and security, not features that degrade security and don't increa…

> Buying a used Pixel is economical, environmental, and likely doesn't support Google

Interesting. What do you think are reasons for google to run Pixel then?

Not being sarcastic here, but what links you shared (thank you) say imply there are almost no benefits for Google to run Pixels and as we all know, Google is not a company doing charities.

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#198
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it possible to install basic Google apps like Gmail, Calendar, Maps, Drive without googlifying the whole phone? I'm not looking to fully de-Google but I want Google as apps and not my OS.

> I'm not looking to fully de-Google but I want Google as apps and not my OS. This is entirely possible as other posters have explained. But I think it kind of defeats the point of Graphene, at least somewhat. Google is already profiling every aspect of your life by reading your emails, files, calendar, location, etc? In that case, OS access becomes moot. I think that GrapheneOS makes most sense as part of a broader…

What are some good alternatives

Re: GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

#200
post #199

GrapheneOS would be so much more interesting if there was an official supported way for rooting it. That's the only reason I haven't switched to it on my several devices (all rooted)

That completely goes against what they're working towards. I understand why you would want to root your own phone, but GOS is targeting highest security standards and root ain't one of them (for good reason).
Post reply on HN