Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

status.claude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 173 posts

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#42

Post by antupis »

enraged_camel wrote: post #27
wxw wrote: post #21

I’ve been using Codex w GPT 5.5 more than Claude Code recently. I think Anthropic won the marketing game because Codex is quite good, even better IME.

I'm not sure about that. Claude has some bugs, but Codex is not as polished and doesn't have as many features. For example, you need to add MCP servers manually. There's no Plugin/Skill/Connector marketplace that is accessible from within the app, like there is with Claude Desktop. The Cowork-equivalent is nowhere as powerful. And so on. I still use Codex, but mostly when I need to check Opus 4.8's work. Pretty sure…

Personally I prefer GPT 5.5 writing style over Opus 4.8. It’s much more no nonsense and information denser.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#43

Post by sunaookami »

evilturnip wrote: post #13

I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message. Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled. In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.

Have you tried out the new fullscreen renderer with /tui ?

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#44

Post by mdavid626 »

evilturnip wrote: post #13

I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message. Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled. In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.

Or pi.dev - also super fast and simple.

Claude Code is sluggish, buggy, slow. Typical big enterprise garbage. The only good thing at Anthropic are the models.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#45

Post by monooso »

evilturnip wrote: post #13

I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message. Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled. In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.

> I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy...

Or possibly as a result of.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#47

Post by sunaookami »

antupis wrote: post #42
enraged_camel wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure about that. Claude has some bugs, but Codex is not as polished and doesn't have as many features. For example, you need to add MCP servers manually. There's no Plugin/Skill/Connector marketplace that is accessible from within the app, like there is with Claude Desktop. The Cowork-equivalent is nowhere as powerful. And so on. I still use Codex, but mostly when I need to check Opus 4.8's work. Pretty sure…

Personally I prefer GPT 5.5 writing style over Opus 4.8. It’s much more no nonsense and information denser.

That's the first time I saw someone prefering GPT-styled output over Claude ;) It's the complete opposite for me, GPT is way too verbose (even after telling it to STFU), overwhelms the user with thousands of options and doesn't just answer a question without shitting out thousands of paragraphs. Also the overall tone is way too enthusiastic.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#48

Post by DonHopkins »

jatora wrote: post #30
dwa3592 wrote: post #19

Anthropic needs to stop writing code using Claude. Bring back humans!!!

i have no humans but i must ship

The last ones left standing will be the fake AI scam companies that actually employ thousands of remote workers to fake it till they make it.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]

#49

Post by wxw »

enraged_camel wrote: post #27
wxw wrote: post #21

I’ve been using Codex w GPT 5.5 more than Claude Code recently. I think Anthropic won the marketing game because Codex is quite good, even better IME.

I'm not sure about that. Claude has some bugs, but Codex is not as polished and doesn't have as many features. For example, you need to add MCP servers manually. There's no Plugin/Skill/Connector marketplace that is accessible from within the app, like there is with Claude Desktop. The Cowork-equivalent is nowhere as powerful. And so on. I still use Codex, but mostly when I need to check Opus 4.8's work. Pretty sure…

There are plugins in the app.

Haven’t tried Cowork, interesting. Isn’t it just the same agent minus the git worktree based UI?

Frankly, neither Claude nor Codex are as good as hype entails.

Post reply on HN