I’ve been using Codex w GPT 5.5 more than Claude Code recently. I think Anthropic won the marketing game because Codex is quite good, even better IME.
Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
21–30 of 173 posts
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#22Coding is largely solved!!
Except when you have internet of course.
Yes I know you can run offline models, but it's hard to pass up on a little bit of snark.
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#23How is their "Claude for Government" having such a good uptime? I thought they were a supply chain risk and banned from use by the government?
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#24I'd be interested in the RCA and the fix; and what the human:ai involvement is in both stages.
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#25Good thing the analog method still works.
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#26How is their "Claude for Government" having such a good uptime? I thought they were a supply chain risk and banned from use by the government?
Left hand, right hand
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#27I’ve been using Codex w GPT 5.5 more than Claude Code recently. I think Anthropic won the marketing game because Codex is quite good, even better IME.
I'm not sure about that. Claude has some bugs, but Codex is not as polished and doesn't have as many features. For example, you need to add MCP servers manually. There's no Plugin/Skill/Connector marketplace that is accessible from within the app, like there is with Claude Desktop. The Cowork-equivalent is nowhere as powerful. And so on.
I still use Codex, but mostly when I need to check Opus 4.8's work. Pretty sure I will stop doing that soon, because during the short time Fable was available, Codex was not able to find any important issues with the code Fable wrote.
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#28I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message. Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled. In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.
On the other hand, my last experience with gemini was like "don't give your sandwich to the dog again" whereas with opus it was more "let's debug why this uncrustables factory is having breakdowns".
Claude harnesses have plenty of bugs but I prefer capability over interface shininess any day. (though if I were running the show I'd have a sizable team set aside to do exclusively boring stability and polish work)
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#29I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message. Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled. In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.
too bad the only good model in antigravity is opus 4.6 haha
Re: Claude: Elevated errors across many models [resolved]
#30Anthropic needs to stop writing code using Claude. Bring back humans!!!
i have no humans but i must ship