Live data from Hacker News

GLM 5.2 Is Out

twitter.com

141–150 of 544 posts

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you can see the CBRN weapon nexus in your examples that's missing from the Tiananmen prompt, right? Do American models refuse to tell you about COINTELPRO, Kent State, or My Lai, for instance?

American models are restricted from telling you inconvenient truths just as much, you just erroneously assume to know what those truths are in the first place. Which is of course circular thinking: why would they restrict things you already know about? Why would they do it in such a clumsy and obvious way? Look at MKULTRA, you know next to nothing about it and much less do you know what they do in that direction now.…

In chats Claude will often start awkwardly apologizing for sounding like a conspiracy theorist, and then interrupt its own apology and remind itself that it's dealing strictly in facts.

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#143
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you can see the CBRN weapon nexus in your examples that's missing from the Tiananmen prompt, right? Do American models refuse to tell you about COINTELPRO, Kent State, or My Lai, for instance?

try to ask even grok about some stuff happenning right now in middle east or related to epstein files - its more and more censored and only sometimes will answer if you ask know what detailed question to ask. One year ago grok wasn't that bad and its supposed to be the less censored.

That shouldn't be used to judge other models - it's never been true for Grok.

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#144
post #88
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Anthropic blocks Fable from answering "Tell me about Agent Orange" or even "Tell me about mitochondria"

Putting aside whether or not I agree with the policy or whether it’s at all reasonable, a policy of restricting access to information because there’s a fear it could be used to create a weapon of mass destruction seems entirely different than restricting access to historical facts because they are embarrassing to the government.

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#145
post #88
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Anthropic blocks Fable from answering "Tell me about Agent Orange" or even "Tell me about mitochondria"

Did you read the blog post where they explained why there was a temporary block on all biology-related questions?

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#146
post #83

Announcement from the founder of Z.ai: “ GLM-5.2 is Fully Open, Frontier Intelligence Belongs to Everyone Today, the sudden restriction of certain frontier models is deeply regrettable. At a time when access to frontier models is abruptly cut off for non-technical reasons, we are even more convinced of one thing: science should be global. The path to AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) must never be enclosed by hig…

[flagged]

Turns out everyone just says the thing that sounds good.

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#147
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I think maybe it’s a tool and it’s up to you to make use of tools to try to let more Chinese people know and convince them to believe your idea. Don’t blame a tool but make proper use of it to make a better world.

Huh?

Re: GLM 5.2 Is Out

#149
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> GLM-5.2 is Fully Open Is this just open weights or also open source/data?

Have any major open weight models been "open data"? Wouldn't that entail distributing vast amounts of copyrighted data?

NVIDIA's recent Nemotrons tend to be open training data and code.

Probably as a base to use by people buying NVIDIA hardware to train their own.

Post reply on HN