Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 274 posts

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#81

Post by flir »

realusername wrote: post #70
chatmasta wrote: post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They give it some thought, but Anthropic and AWS have the whole menu of compliance and security checkboxes needed to reassure CISO it doesn’t need to be “the office of no” and can allow the AI onboarding. The pressure to adopt and adapt to AI is so high right now that there’s nothing a CISO or CFO can say to stop its adoption. And the more they say “no” or “wait,” the more at-risk they put their job.

I know the only reason we are using Claude right now in my large org was because of this policy and another model would have been picked otherwise

A model that opens the slightest gap for a leak would be unacceptable to the org I work for. We are very paranoid about losing vulnerable customers' data.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#82

Post by fc417fc802 »

RA_Fisher wrote: post #46
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

I don’t think there are other models near Fable’s capabilities.

For how long though? The past two months have seen a ridiculous number of model releases.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#83

Post by wqaatwt »

UqWBcuFx6NV4r wrote: post #38
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

Let’s be real, chances are that the people with a lot of money on the line have given it more thought than the passing thought that you gave this comment.

Intelligent individuals tend to make rational decisions very often this doesn’t result in rational behavior on the organizational level.

Large corporations like Microslop, Google, Meta etc. were frequently behave like headless chickens

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#84

Post by fp64 »

wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #24

Note that if you use AWS Bedrock then you're choosing to pay 10X to 20X because you trust AWS more than Anthropic. It is literally 10X to 20-X cheaper to directly buy Anthropic subscriptions for your devs.

I can't use "Claude Max" subscription and the likes with my own software, can I? Using OpenCode instead of ClaudeCode violates the ToS, doesn't it? How would I go about permissions and integrating with my other services I already run on AWS? IAM roles for Bedrock are pretty nice. You appear very confident and concerned about my spending, so please help me here!

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#85

Post by dsign »

The root of the problem is that AI-as-a-service is corked, because companies providing it have a hell of an incentive to use all that data to out-compete their competitors, and they can do so in secret. To say nothing of salivating law-enforcement who really, really wants to tap into it. I'm hoping there will be at some point open-source and affordable hardware that can run competent models.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#86

Post by gauravvij137 »

The data leaving AWS boundary kills this for any regulated workload. We've been running side-by-side evals of open models against Claude on private test suites, using Neo as the orchestration layer. Keeps everything in-house and gives us objective comparison data.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#87

Post by storus »

This smells like an advanced version of corporate espionage. Assuming most companies will use their AI in the future, this will be fed directly to an Echelon-like network that will be leaking "interesting info" to friendly parties, like the Boeing vs Airbus scandal that was first widely reported and then swept under the rug officially.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#88

Post by disgruntledphd2 »

UqWBcuFx6NV4r wrote: post #38
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

Let’s be real, chances are that the people with a lot of money on the line have given it more thought than the passing thought that you gave this comment.

> Let’s be real, chances are that the people with a lot of money on the line have given it more thought than the passing thought that you gave this comment.

In theory, definitely.

But this seems like a really, really, really no-good seriously bad decision from Anthropic. Like, I get why they want this (and can see it from their perspective), but many of their largest clients literally cannot allow this without regulator sign-off, which almost certainly won't be forthcoming.

Like, if the Fed and the ECB say this is OK then it might work, but other than that I predict that this decision will be reversed ~soon.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#89

Post by miohtama »

dsign wrote: post #85

The root of the problem is that AI-as-a-service is corked, because companies providing it have a hell of an incentive to use all that data to out-compete their competitors, and they can do so in secret. To say nothing of salivating law-enforcement who really, really wants to tap into it. I'm hoping there will be at some point open-source and affordable hardware that can run competent models.

Already happening

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/23/openai-tumber-...

Post reply on HN