Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 274 posts

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#51

Post by chatmasta »

UqWBcuFx6NV4r wrote: post #38
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

Let’s be real, chances are that the people with a lot of money on the line have given it more thought than the passing thought that you gave this comment.

They give it some thought, but Anthropic and AWS have the whole menu of compliance and security checkboxes needed to reassure CISO it doesn’t need to be “the office of no” and can allow the AI onboarding. The pressure to adopt and adapt to AI is so high right now that there’s nothing a CISO or CFO can say to stop its adoption. And the more they say “no” or “wait,” the more at-risk they put their job.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#53

Post by ReptileMan »

UqWBcuFx6NV4r wrote: post #38
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

Let’s be real, chances are that the people with a lot of money on the line have given it more thought than the passing thought that you gave this comment.

Counter point - Marisa Mayer and Stephen Elop.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#54

Post by Sayrus »

lima wrote: post #43
xnx wrote: post #35

Is this also the case for Google Cloud? https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platfo...

Fable on GCP requires accepting a 60-day retention policy: https://cloud.google.com/terms/advanced-ai-safety-addendum I don't think it mentions sharing the data with third parties such as Anthropic?

> Through Google Cloud's Agent Platform: Retention will need to be enabled for your new covered model, and retained data stays in your GCP environment. When models become available, onboarding details will be shared.

From https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15425996-data-retenti...

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#55

Post by whynotmaybe »

rohansood15 wrote: post #2

Pretty sure this doesn't work for any regulated enterprise or government client. But AWS knows this, so I am curious why they'd agree to it.

It's the same for girthub copilot [1] which is more present in gov than aws's solutions.

Anthropic is trying, well see if it's a bold strategy.

1. https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-09-claude-fable-5-is-g...

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#56

Post by voxic11 »

pitched wrote: post #30
OtherShrezzing wrote: post #27

This is odd behaviour, and provides some evidence that Anthropic isn't being managed by serious people. With this policy across AWS/GH/Zed/etc, they're taking their massive lead in enterprise/govt sales and handing it to any competitor who can serve a model anywhere near these capabilities with a modestly nice UI.

OpenAI just added their own models to Bedrock recently too, making that an easy switch.

Bedrock doesn't offer zero data retention for OpenAI's latest models either

> For OpenAI GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5, classifier-flagged traffic will be retained for up to 30 days for automated offline abuse detection

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/abuse-d...

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#57

Post by Qhemlomo »

kgwgk wrote: post #48
Qhemlomo wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah thats not the point though. We 'trust' Amazon already and Amazon has no incentive at all to collect the data to finetune claude because they don't own claude.

What is the point then of a submission about how you will be required to share data with Anthropic? I’d say that the point is precisely that it’s an issue when you don’t trust them as much as Amazon.

Not sure if i follow you tbh.

I only told a commentor why a business would pay more to Amazon than going directly to Anthropic.

The announcement itself is def problematic and either leads to big companies accepting this and then going directly to anthropic or some talks in the background we don't know yet what it will entail.

Re: AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

#58

Post by Qhemlomo »

63stack wrote: post #49
Qhemlomo wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah thats not the point though. We 'trust' Amazon already and Amazon has no incentive at all to collect the data to finetune claude because they don't own claude.

Amazon's incentive is to fine tune their own possible future model

Amazon/AWS knows how to handle this conflict in a way that customers trust them enough.

Amazon has more to loose than Anthropic

Post reply on HN