Live data from Hacker News

Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

nbcnews.com

101–110 of 586 posts

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#101
This could be 'curiosity' about negotiation with Iran, as there is what could be considered an AI merger between the 2 countries ; the FY2027 NDAA (H.R. 8800) bill text was officially released by Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL) and Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-WA) on May 26, 2026. - House Armed Services Committee markup was set for June 4, 2026. https://www.uschamber.com/security/letter-to-house-armed-ser... Section 224 of the FY2027 NDAA, titled “United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative,” is a draft provision sponsored by Chairman Mike Rogers and Ranking Member Adam Smith. It aims to deeply integrate U.S. and Israeli defense industries and militaries through joint R&D, testing, manufacturing, technology sharing, training, information-sharing, network integration, and data fusion. AI is one of several technologies included, not a standalone “AI merger.” The provision is still a House committee draft, not final law, and may be amended before passage.https://www.uschamber.com/security/letter-to-house-armed-ser...

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#102
post #59
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe this is a bit glib, but it's because attacking Iran (which everyone knew was a bad idea but which presumably seemed useful as a distraction) turned out to be a bad idea. So the administration is taking it out on Israel, who wanted us to do it.

> everyone knew was a bad idea It was a good idea if it was also timed during the popular uprisings. But the 20,000+ die-hard citizens that would have effected regime change were slaughtered months ago. So now it's just a scared populace hunkering in place while USA warships and jets dominate their country. And the Iranians fire off the occasional drone swarm on UAE.

> the popular uprisings

isn't it obvious that the "popular uprisings" were part of a scheme to overthrow the government to install some US-friendly puppet (or better: Israel-friendly, since that's the only thing that counts), and that the supposedly slaughtered protesters are exactly the reason that is normally put forward to justify an attack on an enemy country?

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#104
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AIPAC publicly brags about this. https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/aipac-says-it-was-pro... https://www.reddit.com/r/illinois/comments/1ry8tha/aipac_ope...

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This is a non-sequitur. It's an "American" organization whose sole purpose is to lobby the US government on behalf of the interests of a foreign government. It should register as a foreign agent as should all its employees because that's exactly how they behave and why they exist.

There's a name for that: Fifth column.

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#108

Israel would be deeply impacted by the results of the negotiations, so is this surprising or unexpected? Any nation including the US would most likely do the same in a similar scenario over what is considered to be almost existential negotiations.

It would be a massive scandal if any of our other allies were conducting this level of spying on our country's senior leadership, for the sole purpose of manipulating their decision processes to the foreign ally's benefit. Israel needs to learn to play by the rules.

Oh, does it apply when the US spies on Europe too? Or only when it's against the US?

Re: Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

#109

Legitimate question, what would Israel need that we don’t already openly provide?

One of the YouTube "CIA former spies" explained it very well (paraphrasing): "we shared the F-35 with them, but we kept about 10% of the technology to ourselves and sold them a variant. That wasn't enough for them, they ran an espionage operation to get the remaining 10%".
Post reply on HN