Live data from Hacker News

Ferrari Luce

ferrari.com

411–420 of 959 posts

Re: Ferrari Luce

#411

Feel like this is an answer to the Lamborghini Urus which, at the time, I remember the internet not being fond of either. But in the real world, they are now a massive status symbol

No, the answer to the Urus (an SUV) is the Purosangue (also an SUV) which has been out for a while and looks somewhat decent. The Luce is an answer to a question nobody asked, probably along the lines of "How to destroy a famed brand's heritage?"

Re: Ferrari Luce

#412
The companion app, showcased at the middle of the page, looks surprisingly under-designed, despite LoveFrom having some of the best UI designers in the world.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#413
Wait, what's with those suicide doors? Weren't they, considered to be super dangerous? Will this car pass the safety regulations in the EU with those doors?

Re: Ferrari Luce

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buttons for turn signals. Yuck. God, Jony Ive is such an insufferable person.

Haven't Ferrari used buttons for turn signals for a while?

Not sure. I've been in a few Ferraris and they all had regular stalks.

It's possible that those buttons are not Jony Ive's doing, but I still find him insufferably pompous.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#416

Someone inside Ferrari had the terrible idea of greenlighting this and even more terrible lack of courage to not cancel this mistake because it was the baby turd of Jony Ive and Marc Newson. Fortunately everyone will laugh and cringe, the usual car "journalists" will bite their tongues because they don't want to lose access, time will pass and it will be forgotten because Ferrari can afford to make these mistakes ( f…

It reminds me of a rant that my friend sometimes goes on with regards to really low quality items, particularly about music... someone wrote it, someone performed it, someone mixed it, someone approved it, someone developed marketing for it, someone helped get it on shelves, and then someone played it. There were plenty of points along the way where the disaster could have been averted.

I don't understand the point of the rant. What disaster is having "bad music" out there? Is it stealing storage from "good music"? I understand this kind of rant for an iPhone, where a shitty decision brought along the chain of approval will impact million of people that are more or less stuck in the ecosystem. But music of all things? How do you even get in contact with "bad music"?

Re: Ferrari Luce

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People have said the same of the first Porsche Cayenne, yet the Porsche SUVs have been outselling their sports cars for years.

That abomination is for porsche wannabes looking for an excuse to be better-than-you, there is a huge market for those

> wannabes looking for an excuse to be better-than-you

Haha, you just perfectly described every porsche dealership employee I've ever met.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#418
post #350

Tangential, but I'm surprised that people here talk about looks as if it's something objective. I don't like how this car looks, but obviously there are other people with other tastes. I might be reading too much into people screaming "ugly" I guess.

An individual’s opinion may not signify anything, but collectively, all those opinions decide if a product is successful or not.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#419
post #195

Lots of comments saying it looks ugly. I don't agree. But the $650,000 price tag is not pretty - that I can agree on. I know people will pay that.

Agreed, I like the design. It just feels horribly misplaced as a Ferrari. It looks like a daily driver car, but the entire instrumentation looks (to my layman's eyes) to larp as race car.

If the dashboard was set up for a normal person and I could see this be a great sedan. But as it stands, it just seems horribly out of touch.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It creates an entirely new torque language controlled by the driver Oh wow, sounds like some corporation BS if I ever read some. My EV works by pressing the gas pedal and the torque is right there - not sure what revolutionary new invention is required?

I will say, Teslas usually have too much torque because I feel very nauseous in them as a passenger. Having more fine grained control over the torque profile might be nice

The reason you feel nauseous as a passenger has nothing to do with the maximum torque output of the vehicle, but because one-pedal driving mode amplifies bad driving habits by people who never learned how to use the accelerator pedal on a car properly.

Way too many people stomp, release, and repeat. This works in Mario Kart when the A-button input is a boolean value but in a Tesla with one-pedal driving turned on you end up repeatedly accelerating or decelerating and never go a constant speed.

Post reply on HN