Because its ultimately cheaper to suppress unions than it is to pay the workers the fair salary.
I'm generally pro-union and certainly fair wage, but it's important to keep in mind that unions will grow into their own power centers and have leadership with its own internal goals which are not aligned with either their working members nor the employers.
US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
11–20 of 230 posts
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#12Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#13Not sure if that is a bad thing - labor unions can have too much power. Its not as if the employers agree to everything that they will go away.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#14Considering the annual revenue of Fortune 500 companies is near 20 Trillion, that is a much smaller amount than expected.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#15Because its ultimately cheaper to suppress unions than it is to pay the workers the fair salary.
I'm generally pro-union and certainly fair wage, but it's important to keep in mind that unions will grow into their own power centers and have leadership with its own internal goals which are not aligned with either their working members nor the employers.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#16Considering the annual revenue of Fortune 500 companies is near 20 Trillion, that is a much smaller amount than expected.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#17Because its ultimately cheaper to suppress unions than it is to pay the workers the fair salary.
I'm generally pro-union and certainly fair wage, but it's important to keep in mind that unions will grow into their own power centers and have leadership with its own internal goals which are not aligned with either their working members nor the employers.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#18This might not seem so annoying, but in the Bay Area where I worked, the unions had lobbied to secure work that could _only_ be done by union members. For example, I was a controls technician, and I legally couldn't wire a 12v controller because it was considered protected work. Which means I had to try to convince the same people who were not incentivized to be productive to help me.
So yeah, after a few years of that, I left with a pretty sour taste in my mouth. That being said, philosophically I like the idea of unions. I've had my own share of experiences being abused by "the man." The retirement plans offered in particular were always alluring. But, despite being invited to join, I never felt compelled because I just couldn't find myself enjoying working with the people they attracted.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#19Not sure if that is a bad thing - labor unions can have too much power. Its not as if the employers agree to everything that they will go away.
Even unions like SAG-AFTRA, which is one of the most extreme ones I can consider barely reach 1% of the harm employers cause.
Re: US employers spend more than $1.5B a year to fight labor unions, report finds
#20Because its ultimately cheaper to suppress unions than it is to pay the workers the fair salary.