Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.
Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
391–400 of 519 posts
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nazi feels like a close enough shorthand for “person who posts white nationalist and antisemitic views, supports authoritarian regimes, and seig heils on stage.”
Oh so like this? https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/zohran-mamdani-faces-ma...
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#393Say what you like about Sam Altman, but given how Anthropic is scrambling to sign capacity deals for compute we can sure say he was right about the capcity build out needed.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#394Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#395> 300 megawatts of new capacity (over 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs) The scale is just mindboggling here. Are there any blog posts or anything discussing what kind of infrastructure is used for even just the inference side (nevermind the training) for SotA models like Opus? I would have thought it might be secret, but given that you can actually run the models yourself on AWS Bedrock doesn't that give an indication?
The massive scale is all massively parallel: test-time compute for users, test time compute for RL rollouts (and probably increasingly environments for those rollouts), other synthetic data generation, research experiments, …
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you worried about Google too? They're selling compute. Same with Microsoft, and Amazon. As far as I know Anthropic is really the only one that's compute-bound.
Amazon is a compute specialist, their competitive advantage is in the compute business. And conversely they're not really trying to play in the AI business, so it's not at all suspicious that they don't want to use all their compute themselves. I am worried about Google and Microsoft, yes.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would a data centre poison the water? They don’t produce any chemicals or do anything.
> Data centers can inadvertently pollute water through chemical runoff from evaporative cooling systems, including biocides, corrosion inhibitors, and heavy metals that accumulate at scale when facilities discharge up to 5 million gallons daily. Source: https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/sustainability/4-strateg...
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you worried about Google too? They're selling compute. Same with Microsoft, and Amazon. As far as I know Anthropic is really the only one that's compute-bound.
Google, Microsoft, and Amazon's business model include selling compute - SpaceX, not so much.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
xAI removed its illegal gas turbines and obtained permits for the others only after being sued by the Southern Environmental Law Center. They then built another unpermitted site (Colossus 2) across the state line in Mississippi, and they are being sued again. [0] "The company began operations at its first site, Colossus 1, in June of 2024 and used as many as 35 unpermitted gas turbines to power the facility. Despite…
[flagged]
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#400Say what you like about Sam Altman, but given how Anthropic is scrambling to sign capacity deals for compute we can sure say he was right about the capcity build out needed.
Or the bubble he was pumping hasn't popped yet. We won't be able to say how much of this capacity was actually "needed" until 10 years in the future, if ever.