I checked the specs here: https://www.micron.com/content/dam/micron/global/public/prod... The interface looks equiv to 4x PCIe 5.0. > Sequential read (MB/s): 13,700 > Sequential write (MB/s): 2,700 That is pretty awful write performance. Does anyone know more about this? I assume all of these hyperdense SSDs suffer from the same drawback. Also, I heard that the E3.L interface can support up to 16x lanes, but there ar…
65 hours to restore a full backup
245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
61–70 of 204 posts
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
They haven't released details but I was able to find a Solidigm D5-P5336 122.88TB drive for around 40,000 USD, as a guideline. So ... more than that.
I was quoted $18K for a 3.7 TB Dell NVMe disk the other day. I'm gonna guess these drives are literally a quarter million each
surely you don't actually think that's realistic pricing?
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#63Funny thing is that one of the best you can get is the Crucial (Micron) 8TB one but even that one gets more expensive. I have the feeling it will be gone completely soon.
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#64Can someone who knows explain what is the benefit of having all that data in one ssd instead of splitting it up into hundreds of individual drives? Does the single ssd benefit is more performance or does it really tuen out to be cheaper than hundreds of individual drives?
It’s about density in a datacenter. With this you have 1PB in 4 drives, fitting in a 1u rack, which is just incredible. Also these drives don’t use regular SATA or SAS, they use PCIe, so these drives are also quite fast in comparison. Density has a power efficiency aspect as well both in just having fewer drives and requiring fewer servers to put drives into.
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
QLC retention reported to be around 1 year in unpowered state. I would assume, that drive does background refresh, though. No idea what effect it has on total drive lifetime. It is still mean that if you use it for cold storage it has to be powered.
Why is it mean? Why would you want to use a technology that is unsuitable for cold storage for cold storage? You won't even get the power / IOPS benefit if all it does is an infrequent replication of data and is then switched off.
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#66How big of a deal is this part in relation to the initial upfront costs? I’m not privy to the cost of power for SSD
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#67Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#68I look forward to have my favourite hyperscaler grant me 1000 "premium" IOPS per VM on this monster.
IOPS? This thing has slower IOPS than an old SATA SSD (~40k / QLC). I think it is meant for sequential operations only.
Also: price is expected to be $80k. I suppose density is the selling point here, not speed.
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#69“For AI workloads: The 245TB Micron 6600 ION provided up to 84 times better energy efficiency” How big of a deal is this part in relation to the initial upfront costs? I’m not privy to the cost of power for SSD
Getting rid of 30 watts of heat is trivial compared to say, 300 (I don't quite know how to read that ratio since a 2.5kW SSD seems a little high to me).
Re: 245TB Micron 6600 ION Data Center SSD Now Shipping
#70“For AI workloads: The 245TB Micron 6600 ION provided up to 84 times better energy efficiency” How big of a deal is this part in relation to the initial upfront costs? I’m not privy to the cost of power for SSD
It means you don't have as much to cool. Getting rid of 30 watts of heat is trivial compared to say, 300 (I don't quite know how to read that ratio since a 2.5kW SSD seems a little high to me).