Rule does not apply to gadgets that already retain 80% charge capacity at 1k charge cycles. What is the share of the smartphone market that this applies to?
You can bet it will be measured in such a way that the major companies’ devices will qualify. And that it will have little bearing on the retained charge amount you’ll have in real life use. I’m at 82% and 714 cycles. But it’s a joke to suggest that all cycles are equal. Some people never go outside the 20-80 band, others charge to 100% and keep it there all day, then burn it down to 10%. Both of those generate “cycl…
Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
141–150 of 560 posts
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which flagship phones with replaceable batteries can customers buy? Samsung was the last major brand in the US to have one, and they made the choice to remove it.
"Which flagship phones with replaceable batteries can customers buy?" Most of the Kyocera Duraforce line has this ability.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which flagship phones with replaceable batteries can customers buy? Samsung was the last major brand in the US to have one, and they made the choice to remove it.
"Which flagship phones with replaceable batteries can customers buy?" Most of the Kyocera Duraforce line has this ability.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
i’m ok with this and an $80 battery replacement in exchange for better waterproofing
My low-cost plastic Casio watch based on a very old design is waterproof and battery can be swapped out by undoing 4 philips screws, no glue. Its buttons can also be operated under water while staying waterproof. What is this whicraft?
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
My low-cost plastic Casio watch based on a very old design is waterproof and battery can be swapped out by undoing 4 philips screws, no glue. Its buttons can also be operated under water while staying waterproof. What is this whicraft?
I get it for watches, but I've never understood the mass-market need for a waterproof phone, outside of a few niche hobbies. Are people showering and swimming with their phones or something? Or dropping them in their toilets? The wettest my phone has ever been in 8 years is in my pocket while it's raining.
In other words, I absolutely see the need for waterproof phones, even for ordinary people doing ordinary things, and am never going to buy one that isn't.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#146The number of people worried about a slightly thicker phone are absolutely baffling to me. I honestly think there is no hope for us broadly. Normally I'd say that people cannot deal with minor inconveniences -- but this does not even register as an inconvenience. From my view, this is a _perceived_ downgrade in luxury status. Not even a real downgrade in luxury status -- and not a downgrade in convenience whatsoever.
> this does not even register as an inconvenience You don’t have any idiosyncratic product preferences?
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#147Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still, the majority of the population would get a phone with replaceable battery.
All the top smartphone manufacturers hit that bar, at least for their mid and high end phones. The focus on apple is misleading and weird. This will only impact bottom barrel phones.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#149I just called the shop to replace the perfectly fine e-Call battery in my soon four year old Hyundai car. 250€ to change a battery that has a ten year lifespan. I am not allowed to replace it on my own as it would invalidate the five year long guarantee provided by the manufacturer (not the one by law). Why is this stuff not considered as well? Also curious whether the "specialized devices" exemptions are AND require…
They're the ones paying for repairs, so it doesn't seem that unreasonable? That said: If you can prove the car is being maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications they can't require you to go to a brand dealership. That's just not necessarily easy to prove.