Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

github.blog

251–260 of 583 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#251

How is this legal when people paid for a yearly plan in advance?

In places with reasonable consumer protections (Australia, Germany) it almost certainly is illegal unless they give a full (whole year) refund. I think the short time limit of applying for a refund won't be looked at favorably either. Regardless of their ToS which I'm sure covers this.

But companies do lots of illegal things, and in general nobody takes them to court over it.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#252
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't call it hindsight - I don't think anyone, at any stage, thought running a 10 minute+ sonnet session for 1 premium credit was ever profitable. We all knew it was a loss leader to get people using it.

It would have been profitable if that premium credit cost more than a negotiated discounted rate with Anthropic. We have no way of knowing if there were negotiated rates though!

There is no way to make that cost model profitable consistently. If 1 prompt can mean 100's/1000's of requests over hours, and you only pay for that 1 premium prompt, that can never be profitable.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#253

So given that I primarily interact with LLM's through VSCode, and I prefer the Copilot interface to the Claude Code plugin, does anyone have any suggestions on other plugins I should try? In my experience, Copilot is much more "plugged in" than any of the other plugins, in the sense that it can see things like linter outputs in VSCode. Basically, copilot "sees what I see" in a way that no other plugin or command line…

I used to feel exactly like you do, but now I use the Claude CLI exclusively and am very pleased with the results.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DeepSeek will do the same thing. Z/Mimo already raised their prices multiple times since the promotional prices at the start of the year.

DeepSeek is actually more expensive than expected ATM due to compute shortage, but they said it would come down in price.

The compute shortage will be bigger 3 months from now.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#255
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of us have noticed that usage limits for Claude have been nerfed in recent weeks/months. If anything, these new multipliers are more transparent than anything OpenAI or Anthropic have communicated regarding actual costs and give us a more realistic understanding of what it's costing these providers. The fact that we were able to get such a substantial amount of usage for $20/$100/$200 a month was never meant to…

It does feel like the music is about to stop. It has been years now, of cash injections, investors can't keep feeding the beast forever.

It has been years now of reading this same comment... Surely people can't keep typing it forever.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#256
post #4

The era of subsidised inference is truly ending. The new model multipliers ( https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing... ) seem like a huge leap, though. From 1x to 6x for new-ish GPT and Sonnet models. 27x for Opus... Seems like folks would be better off with OpenRouter instead.

It's interesting that the cost multiplier for Claude Sonnet 4/4.5/4.6 varies so much (1/6/9), while the API cost is exactly the same for all three models.

Also, the multiplier of 27 for Claude Opus 4.6/4. is way higher than the increase in API price would suggest.

I wonder why that is.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#258
post #25

I was curious why a company would still use the VS Code + Copilot sidebar method for coding, rather than something like Claude Code. Turns out there’s a GitHub Copilot CLI! I thought I was pretty familiar with available options, but no one in my circles ever mentions this product. It doesn’t seem to have much mindshare. Has anyone used it? What’s your experience? https://github.com/features/copilot/cli

> I was curious why a company would still use the VS Code + Copilot sidebar method for coding, rather than something like Claude Code. I use Claude Code, but I kept my Copilot subscription around mostly for really cheap usage of other models when I need to try a different one (which appears to be ending, in a sense) and also the autocomplete in Visual Studio Code which was really great across a bunch of files, I coul…

> also the autocomplete in Visual Studio Code which was really great across a bunch of files I wonder what other good autocomplete is out there.

I am in the same boat. I tried looking for tab/auto-complete implementations ~ a year ago and it was pretty disappointing. If that has changed, would love to know!

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#259
post #148
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just be aware OpenRouter charges a 5.5% fee, I didn’t know until recently. I like the product, and I think the fee is fair, but if you want the absolute best pricing then go direct.

But with open router you can always just use the latest model. If you're committed to eg Claude opus then you're better off going directly to anthropic for sure, but if not, varying other models may be fine too, depending on use case and be massively cheaper. Eg new deep seek model with same mio context window or Kimi k2.6 with 270k context window for subagents which implement

>but if not, varying other models may be fine too, depending on use case and be massively cheaper

Do inference providers have standardized endpoints, or at least endpoints compatible with claude code? Otherwise to pay 5.5% on all your tokens just so it's slightly easier to swap providers (ie. changing a few urls?)

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#260

Something is hilariously off here: Why should I pay $10 and be forced to use it by the end of the month, while I can pay $10 and have it last as long as I want? Their "API pricing" is exactly the same as that of providers: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing...

Is there a way to use the autocomplete feature with an api?
Post reply on HN