I would easily guess that he does that because he is able to have the fine waived by abusing of his status!
To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
101–110 of 156 posts
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#102> The expert, former cop turned criminal justice professor Michael Alcazar, said Giovansanti should face “serious discipline.” But that’s not happening — an NYPD spokesperson shrugged off the suggestion of punishment because Giovansanti’s tickets are “not related to his job or his duties in the department.” This angers me. Police officers are granted special privileges that ordinary citizens are not, and should be he…
The same way we can trust an overweight doctor, a depressed therapist, a housecleaner who doesn't make their bed, or me to verify code I push to corporate repos even while I vibecode apps at home for fun without paying attention. I don't understand the basis for applying this standard to cops.
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#103> The expert, former cop turned criminal justice professor Michael Alcazar, said Giovansanti should face “serious discipline.” But that’s not happening — an NYPD spokesperson shrugged off the suggestion of punishment because Giovansanti’s tickets are “not related to his job or his duties in the department.” This angers me. Police officers are granted special privileges that ordinary citizens are not, and should be he…
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
NYPD policy should probably consider repeated reckless disregard for the law to be a discipline issue.
If he paid the fine, I don't know that it's disregard for the law. The laws says if you do this, you owe a fine. If you pay the fine, it's following the law.
You're following the part of the law that punishes you for violating the other part of the law, not the law that originally punished you. This is an important distinction.
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#105The big question they didn't even scratch is doesn't he have to pay the fines in the end? I don't understand why someone would be ok to pay probably 10k to 40k of fines every year just for a dozen of mph excessive speed. I would easily guess that he does that because he is able to have the fine waived by abusing of his status!
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#106Is Staten Island like Hawaii, where everyone drives slow? Because they're talking like 41 mph is super fast, but to me it's not that fast at all (here the interstate is 70 mph, arterial city streets are 40-50 mph, and people regularly speed).
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
> escalating multiplier for reoffense within the same category of offense with a cool down period of a few years if they don't break the law. My country - Poland - implemented this part a couple of years ago. Specifically a reoffense in the same category within two years results in a higher tier fine - about twice the usual amount. Fines were also adjusted for inflation after over 20 years of being nominally the same…
Jesus christ, 140kph?!? That’s fast. Max speed limit where i live is 120kph and that feels too fast for most roads.
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#108That's absolutely horrifying... Relatively small increases in speed dramatically increase the stopping distance and as such the danger of driving. Especially with a huge truck like that. That's why Amsterdam (with much more food traffic) has recently reduced speed limits a lot. > At 30km/h, the stopping distance of a car is 13 metres. At 50km/h it’s more than double at 27 metres. That 20km/h reduction is the crucial…
What you're saying is all true, but typically road design influence driving speed more than anything. Changing speed limits rarely has an impact on that (at least in the US).
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#109> The expert, former cop turned criminal justice professor Michael Alcazar, said Giovansanti should face “serious discipline.” But that’s not happening — an NYPD spokesperson shrugged off the suggestion of punishment because Giovansanti’s tickets are “not related to his job or his duties in the department.” This angers me. Police officers are granted special privileges that ordinary citizens are not, and should be he…
The same way we can trust an overweight doctor, a depressed therapist, a housecleaner who doesn't make their bed, or me to verify code I push to corporate repos even while I vibecode apps at home for fun without paying attention. I don't understand the basis for applying this standard to cops.
Re: To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets
#110> The expert, former cop turned criminal justice professor Michael Alcazar, said Giovansanti should face “serious discipline.” But that’s not happening — an NYPD spokesperson shrugged off the suggestion of punishment because Giovansanti’s tickets are “not related to his job or his duties in the department.” This angers me. Police officers are granted special privileges that ordinary citizens are not, and should be he…
The same way we can trust an overweight doctor, a depressed therapist, a housecleaner who doesn't make their bed, or me to verify code I push to corporate repos even while I vibecode apps at home for fun without paying attention. I don't understand the basis for applying this standard to cops.
Because those other examples don't involve breaking the law.
At the risk of pointing out the obvious: society holds breaking the law to be more serious than being fat or not making your bed.
Now, speeding is very much a lesser form of breaking the law...but then again, very few people have literally hundreds of speeding tickets.