Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.0

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

611–620 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#611

Post by sigmoid10 »

teruakohatu wrote: post #550
justani wrote: post #545

I have a few cases where nano banana fails all the time, even gpt image 2 is failing. A 3 * 3 cube made out of small cubes, with a small 2 * 2 cube removed from it - https://chatgpt.com/share/69e85df6-5840-83e8-b0e9-3701e92332... Create a dot grid containing a rectangle covering 4 dots horizontally and 3 dots vertically - https://chatgpt.com/share/69e85e4b-252c-83e8-b25f-416984cf30... One where Nano banana fails but…

> A 3 * 3 cube made out of small cubes, with a small 2 * 2 cube removed from it - https://chatgpt.com/share/69e85df6-5840-83e8-b0e9-3701e92332 ... It is a little ambiguous (what exactly is a "3x3 cube") but I tried a bunch of variations and I simply could not get any Gemini models to produce the right output.

You can do it, but it takes two steps. Code is generally better to create such strict geometry (even from ambiguous prompts), while the image diffusion model is great for tuning style and lighting.

https://chatgpt.com/share/69e88b5c-8628-83eb-8851-f587ef2c95...

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#612

Post by wiseowise »

randyrand wrote: post #444
squidsoup wrote: post #238

Are camera manufacturers working on signed images? That seems like the only way our trust in any digital media doesn't collapse entirely.

Signed images don’t get you much. You can just hardwire the image sensor to a computer and sign raw pixels.

Make cameras tamper resistant, like POS terminals.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#613

Post by lionkor »

Every cent you spend on this, remember: The people who made this possible are not even getting a millionth of a cent for every billion USD made with it (they are getting nothing). Same with code; that code you spent years pouring over, fixing, etc. is now how these companies make so much money and get so much investment. It's like open source, except you get shafted.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#614

Post by wiseowise »

StefanBatory wrote: post #605

Do you think those working at ChatGPT have ever wondered how they are contributing to dismantling democracy and ensuring nothing is true by now? The ultimate technological postmodernism.

They’re too busy counting cash. Most of them are what? 30 something to 50? By the time democracy is dismantled they’ll be living in their protected mansions.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#616

Post by wiseowise »

bulletsvshumans wrote: post #241
kibibu wrote: post #107

Genuine question: what positive use cases are sufficient to accept the harm from image generators? One that i can think of: - replacing photography of people who may be unable to consent or for whom it may be traumatic to revisit photographs and suitable models may not be available, e.g. dementia patients, babies, examples of medical conditions. Most other vaguely positive use cases boil down to "look what image gene…

Democratizing visual communication is arguably useful, for instance helping people to create diagrams that illustrate a concept they wish to convey. This is contingent on the tech working sufficiently well that the visuals are more effective at communication than the text that went into producing them though.

Democratizing visual communication? Kim Jong Goon has taken away your pen and paper?

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#618

Post by dodslaser »

razorbeamz wrote: post #602
minimaxir wrote: post #234

So during my Nano Banana Pro experiments I wrote a very fun prompt that tests the ability for these image generation models to follow heuristics, but still requires domain knowledge and/or use of the search tool: Create a 8x8 contiguous grid of the Pokémon whose National Pokédex numbers correspond to the first 64 prime numbers. Include a black border between the subimages. You MUST obey ALL the FOLLOWING rules for th…

Neither of them drew them in an 8-bit style either. It's way too many colors.

Maybe they're so advanced they learned to write to the palette registers mid-scanline.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#619

Post by wiseowise »

NewsaHackO wrote: post #421
tdb7893 wrote: post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's always felt like way overhyping to call something "democratization" when it's something I could do as a middle schooler in 2005. It takes some skill to do very well but it's not like basic diagram creation isn't something people already could do for basically free (I create figures for my job all the time now and chatGPT is more expensive than tools I use for design). Commissioning high quality diagrams from a d…

You are making a mistake a lot of people make when talking about genAI helping others do work. I get that to you it is very easy to do, but there are other groups of people that are not able to do it. What you are saying is like a hobbyist carpenter saying that making a bedside table would take him one weekend to do, so he doesn't think it is okay for tables to be made via assembly line instead of hiring a carpenter…

We’re taking about diagrams, all it takes is an experimentation and an iota of thought.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#620

Post by rambojohnson »

qnleigh wrote: post #607
parasti wrote: post #554

A great technical achievement, for sure, but this is kind of the moment where it enters uncanny valley to me. The promo reel on the website makes it feel like humans doing incredible things (background music intentionally evokes that emotion), but it's a slideshow of computer generatated images attempting to replicate the amazing things that humans do. It's just crazy to look at those images and have to consciously r…

No this is what life looks like on the other side of the uncanny valley. The images don't look creepy because they look artificial or wrong. They're a reminder of a creepy new reality where our eyes can no longer tell us what's real.

Online.
Post reply on HN