Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.0

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

441–450 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#441

Post by twobitshifter »

mwcampbell wrote: post #317
simonw wrote: post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think there's real value to be had in using this for diagrams. Visual explanations are useful, but most people don't have the talent and/or the time to produce them. This new model (and Nano Banana Pro before it) has tipped across the quality boundary where it actually can produce a visual explanation that moves beyond space-filling slop and helps people understand a concept. I've never used an AI-generated image i…

Are there any models that are specifically trained to produce diagrams as SVG? I'd much prefer that to diffusion-based raster image generation models for a few reasons: - The usual advantages of vector graphics: resolution-independence, zoom without jagged edges, etc. - As a consequence of the above, vector graphics (particularly SVG) can more easily be converted to useful tactile graphics for blind people. - Vector…

You can get them to produce mermaid diagrams, but you can also generate these yourself from text.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#442

Post by rattlesnakedave »

wewtyflakes wrote: post #232
simonw wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just got a much better version using this command instead, which uses the maximum image size according to https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples... OPENAI_API_KEY="$(llm keys get openai)" \ uv run 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/simonw/tools/refs/heads/main/python/openai_image.py' \ -m gpt-image-2 \ "Do a where's Waldo style image but it's where is the raccoon holding a ham radio" \ --quali…

A startling number of people either have no arms, one arm, a half of an arm, or a shrunken arm; how odd!

To be fair, the average person has fewer than two arms.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#444

Post by randyrand »

squidsoup wrote: post #238

Are camera manufacturers working on signed images? That seems like the only way our trust in any digital media doesn't collapse entirely.

Signed images don’t get you much. You can just hardwire the image sensor to a computer and sign raw pixels.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#447

Post by pickleRick243 »

adamhartenz wrote: post #429
echelon wrote: post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am starting to think that expressing thoughts in words clearly is probably the most important and general skill of the future. Without question. AI will be indistinguishable from having a team. Communicating clearly has always and will always mattered. This, however, is even stronger. Because you can program and use logic in your communications. We're going to collectively develop absolutely wild command over ins…

How can AI be the amazing thing you say it is, but also too stupid to understand unless you get really good at communicating. Wouldn't better AI just mean it understands your ramblings better?

It's fine if the "rambling" is logically coherent. So the communication ability isn't really about expressing your thoughts eloquently, but just effectively and clearly. Run on sentences and train of thought is fine as long as you are saying something meaningful. But no AI will be able to read your mind and know exactly what you mean by "make really cool looking website, not lame please, also nice colors, not boring". Declarative programming through natural language will become incredibly powerful.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#448

Post by Planktonne »

tempaccount5050 wrote: post #164
Gigachad wrote: post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is where I’m at. If you can’t be bothered to write/make it, why would I be bothered to read or review it?

Because I'm not an artist and can't afford to pay one for whatever business I have? This idea that only experts are allowed to do things is just crazy to me. A band poster doesn't have to be a labor of love artisanal thing. Were you mad when people made band posters with MS word instead of hiring a fucking typesetter? I just don't get it.

No one is saying that only experts can do things; that's a totally inaccurate reading of the argument and the post.

People are saying, very clearly, that they're not willing to put effort into something produced by someone who put no effort in.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#449

Post by raincole »

adamhartenz wrote: post #429
echelon wrote: post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am starting to think that expressing thoughts in words clearly is probably the most important and general skill of the future. Without question. AI will be indistinguishable from having a team. Communicating clearly has always and will always mattered. This, however, is even stronger. Because you can program and use logic in your communications. We're going to collectively develop absolutely wild command over ins…

How can AI be the amazing thing you say it is, but also too stupid to understand unless you get really good at communicating. Wouldn't better AI just mean it understands your ramblings better?

Many humans are great at their expertise but bad at communicating. How?

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0

#450

Post by cozzyd »

wewtyflakes wrote: post #232
simonw wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just got a much better version using this command instead, which uses the maximum image size according to https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples... OPENAI_API_KEY="$(llm keys get openai)" \ uv run 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/simonw/tools/refs/heads/main/python/openai_image.py' \ -m gpt-image-2 \ "Do a where's Waldo style image but it's where is the raccoon holding a ham radio" \ --quali…

A startling number of people either have no arms, one arm, a half of an arm, or a shrunken arm; how odd!

This is why they're congregating around the first aid and the lost and found
Post reply on HN