Earlier quoted context omitted.
Vehicles incur costs on the infrastructure as a function of their weight and usage. Petrol engines pay taxes at the pump. There is no tax hypothication in this, it goes to general revenue, but as EV rise, general tax revenue falls. The government has an obligation of sorts, to try and normalise tax collection to the model, and the model is now breaking so they need to implement something, doing nothing is not an opti…
Vehicles have road taxes. It’s a very clumbsy and annoying way the UK have planned this new tax. I hope other countries do not copy it.
In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
151–160 of 231 posts
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is that there is not enough infrastructure for EVs. If you can't charge at home (e.g. you live in a flat), it is hard to live with an EV and it's much more expensive than the ICE.
The problem isn't infrastructure. Its the amount of Li in reserve.
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#153Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
Death spiral to gas stations? why? EV cars need to charge somewhere (and on long trip it can’t be at home) and people need to take a break and grab a coffee sometime too. They will change, sure, but certainly not die. Refineries will be fewer but we do need another products from them also.
I'm using the definitions: - Gas Station = retail outlet that sells and dispenses gasoline and other petroleum-based fuel products - Charging station = place to charge your EV Could be an interesting long bet. Will the number of retail locations selling gasoline in the UK in the year 2045 be higher or lower than in 2026?
I don't see how this is an interesting bet. No new petrol car will have been sold for 10 years. Places selling fuel for large lorries etc will last a bit longer, but these are already a fraction of the total.
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I've seen, I have no reason to expect that a cheap new Chinese EV sold in the U.S. would be meaningfully lower quality than a cheap new American car.
Conversely, I have no reason to expect that a new Chinese EV sold in the US would be meaningfully cheaper than a new American car. At least not to the extent that China fans are dreaming about. That just is not how markets work.
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#156Meanwhile Ford’s CEO said that if Chinese EVs are allowed into USA it will destroy the US automakers. He is not even hiding the fact US automakers make a more expensive inferior product, but that US consumers should not be allowed have the superior one.
No, its because the Chinese subsidize the costs of those cars. Say I live in a country that will pay me $50k to build a car. It costs me say, $55K to build the car which I now sell for $60K. How you do you, in a country that pays you nothing to build cars, compete? This is an extreme example but its what is happening here (just will different and smaller numbers).
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Ford’s CEO said that if Chinese EVs are allowed into USA it will destroy the US automakers I'm a strong advocate for giving Chinese EVs an import quota per manufacturer (with a 1.5mm-unit annual cap on total Chinese EV imports, downgradable to 1mm in a recession, representing about 10% of demand). This gives American consumers–and designers–access to and a taste for what the competition is doing. But it preserves a…
So no free market. Consumers have to subsidise crap companies.
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
In other words, EVs are used in a bait-and-switch scheme. First promising lower operating costs and negative externalities, then moving to new taxes possibly progressively increasing over time past the ICE taxation, and mandatory built-in surveillance and remote control.
Thats a very specific take on things. Nobody promised negative externalities as I understand it, I believe it was pretty clear the component of government taxation in fuel was going to have to exist somehow in this. Your "possibly increasing over time past the ICE indexation" is very cynical but I would be in the worlds of ad hom if I carried on. I don't think you are here argung in good faith, if thats your basis of…
I drop my HN accounts when they reach certain karma threshold so that I am not surfing on my past successes but keep relevant in the present. I think you have the collector approach instead and use it as a weapon.
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
that would depend on the infrastucture cost to install such charging and to maintain it? This is kerbside slow charging presumably overnight. Note that spaces in these residental areas are typically not even marked spaces; the worst outcome might be losing more footpath space to charging infra for road users.
Non-fast chargers aren't very big. They can be installed in lampposts, or in lampost-diameter boxes sunk into the pavement (with the socket sticking out at the top)
Re: In the UK, EVs are cheaper than petrol cars, thanks to Chinese competition
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fuel taxes don't seem to take into account the quartic scaling of damage by vehicle weight on pavement.
Well, if they did then EVs would pay more, since they are much heavier., because of, you know, the batteries.
My Model 3 (RWD SR+ 2023) is 1847kg unloaded weight, including driver.