Live data from Hacker News

AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

stephvee.ca

101–110 of 439 posts

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#101
post #4

> The poison fountain itself is hosted on rnsaffn.com Would the scrapers not just add these sites to do not crawl list?

I assume the poisoner community is mirroring and likely remixing the content from there. The whole effort isn’t going to work with a single point of failure like that.

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#102
post #17

This whole poisoning intent is so incredibly misappropriated, that I feel sad about it. First of all - there is enough content to train on already, that is not poisoned, and second - the other new content is largely populated in automated manner from the real world, and by workers in large shops in Africa, that are being paid to not produce shit. So yes, you can pollute the good old internet even more, but no, you ca…

You should check out "model collapse". It seems that an abundance of content, that is more and more AI generated these days, may not be a viable option. There is also a vast amount of data that is increasingly going private or behind paywalls

People love harping on this one, but model collapse hasn't turned out to be an issue in practice.

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#103
post #74

I do understand people's dislike / hatred for AI but I am equally baffled. I feel like the same people that shout "Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor" are the exact same types that hate AI. The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. The "cyber psychosis" thing is overblown just like the "Tesla ignites its passengers" is. The only reason it gets i…

> Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor "Capitalism sucks" has become a pretty universal slogan, but traditionally, leftists didn't want less labor (that's what the capital owners want), but more control about their labour.

It is hard to explain that for people who are still invested in the calvinist view of work and success in 2026

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#104
post #61

> Since these companies can’t improve their AI models without fresh data created by human beings Totally wrong. Self-play dates back to Arthur Samuel in the 1950s and RL with verifiable rewards is a key part of training the most advanced models today.

Current models don't yet use RLVR with self-play though, at least as far as we know. They use RLVR with large numbers of manually created RL environments.

But they will probably use self-play soon. See https://www.amplifypartners.com/blog-posts/self-play-and-aut...

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#105
post #90

Is this just Luddism in 21st century? I kind of feel bad for the pathetic (mental) state one must be in to take this kind of activism seriously

I think AI is super cool and use it everyday, I also think its likely to cause extreme human suffering. If AGI is let loose on the world I am confident millions of people are going to die.

> I also think its likely to cause extreme human suffering

yeah no. thinking this way is hyperbolic and just plain wrong

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#107

I'm old enough to remember a time when the primary hacker cause was DRM, the DMCA, patent trolls, export controls for PGP, etc. All things that made it difficult to use information when you want to. "Information wants to be free." It's wild to see the about face. Now it's: > If [companies] can’t source training data ethically, then I see absolutely no reason why any website operator should make it easy for them to st…

This is what happens when a culture doesn't have robust exclusionary mechanisms for people who want to burn it down.

We welcomed the vampires in and wonder why our necks hurt.

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#108

I do understand people's dislike / hatred for AI but I am equally baffled. I feel like the same people that shout "Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor" are the exact same types that hate AI. The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. The "cyber psychosis" thing is overblown just like the "Tesla ignites its passengers" is. The only reason it gets i…

>The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly , is the exact thing you hate. This is a machine that has been trained on vast amounts of stolen data. This is a machine that is being actively sold by the companies that build it as something that will destroy jobs. This is a machine that has a lot of cheerleaders who are actively hostile to people who say "I do not like that this plagar…

And what kind of UBI? With what kinds of strings attached?

Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. I think this is easily explained: Sequencing matters. It I lose my job due to AI and it takes just 1-2 years for AI benefits to arrive at my door, that is plenty of time to be very anxious about my life. If I was guaranteed the AI benefits before I potentially lose my job, very different story. That seems ha…

What people mean when they cry to be freed from their labor, is the requirement to labor. They want to be liberated from bills. If the angle were "AI is going to make your bills go away" everyone would be ecstatic about it. Instead it's "AI is going to make your job go away... so you can't pay your bills".

Yeah. That is the current angle. We have not setup another one and I don't know that any one institution can.

I think it's laudable (and unprecedented) that AI companies themselves are fairly gloom about some potential prospects, and give people opportunity to rally against them. Still needs work towards a solution, though.

Post reply on HN