Live data from Hacker News

Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

kimi.com

31–40 of 394 posts

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#31
post #18

wow - $0.95 input/$4 output. If its anywhere near opus 4.6 that's incredible.

This should erase any doubt that AI Labs are making $$$ on API inference.

Kimi 2.5 (which this is based on) is served at $0.44 input / $2 output by a ton of different providers on OpenRouter, 2.6 will certainly be similar.

That's about 11X less than Opus for similar smarts.

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#32
post #20
post #8

K2.5 was already pretty decent so I would try this. Starting at $15/month: https://www.kimi.com/membership/pricing edit: Note that you can run it yourself with sufficient resources (e.g., companies), or access it from other providers too: https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2.6/providers

How are the usage limits compared to Anthropic?

Anthropic has the worst usage limits in the industry

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#33

I've always been surprised Kimi doesn't get more attention than it does. It's always stood out to me in terms of creativity, quality... has been my favorite model for awhile (but I'm far from an authority)

Dirt cheap on openrouter for how good it is, too. Really hoping that 2.6 carries on that tradition.

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#34
Really excited to try this one, I've been using kimi 2.5 for design and it's really good but borderline useless on backend/advanced tasks.

Also discovered that using OpenCode instead of the kimi cli, really hurts the model performance (2.5).

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#38

https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6 Is this the same model? Unsloth quants: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-K2.6-GGUF (work in progress, no gguf files yet, header message saying as much)

Quite curious how well real usage will back the benchmarks, because even if it's only Opus ballpark, open weights Opus ballpark is seismic.

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#39

Beats opus 4.6! They missed claiming the frontier by a few days.

While I'm skeptical of any "beats opus" claims (many were said, none turned out to be true), I still think it's insane that we can now run close-to-SotA models locally on ~100k worth of hardware, for a small team, and be 100% sure that the data stays local. Should be a no-brainer for teams that work in areas where privacy matters.

I think this one is only about 600GB VRAM usage, so it could fit on two mac studios with 512GB vram each. That would have costed (albeit no longer available) something like less than 20k.

Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding

#40
post #31
post #18

wow - $0.95 input/$4 output. If its anywhere near opus 4.6 that's incredible.

This should erase any doubt that AI Labs are making $$$ on API inference. Kimi 2.5 (which this is based on) is served at $0.44 input / $2 output by a ton of different providers on OpenRouter, 2.6 will certainly be similar. That's about 11X less than Opus for similar smarts.

Famously, OpenAI and Anthropic are devoted to increasing efficiency before scaling up resource usage.
Post reply on HN