Beats opus 4.6! They missed claiming the frontier by a few days.
While I'm skeptical of any "beats opus" claims (many were said, none turned out to be true), I still think it's insane that we can now run close-to-SotA models locally on ~100k worth of hardware, for a small team, and be 100% sure that the data stays local. Should be a no-brainer for teams that work in areas where privacy matters.
Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
11–20 of 394 posts
Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#12Beats opus 4.6! They missed claiming the frontier by a few days.
Opus is clearly a sidegrade meant to help Anthropic manage cost, so I would say they may have it if it actually beats 4.6
Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#13Wow, if the benchmarks checkout with the vibes, this could almost be like a Deepseek moment with Chinese AI now being neck and neck with SOTA US lab made models
With the previous generation? Yes. With 10T mythos-level models? Not even close.
Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#14Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#15Wow, if the benchmarks checkout with the vibes, this could almost be like a Deepseek moment with Chinese AI now being neck and neck with SOTA US lab made models
With the previous generation? Yes. With 10T mythos-level models? Not even close.
Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#16Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#17Is this the same model?
Unsloth quants: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-K2.6-GGUF
(work in progress, no gguf files yet, header message saying as much)
Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#18Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#19Re: Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding
#20K2.5 was already pretty decent so I would try this. Starting at $15/month: https://www.kimi.com/membership/pricing edit: Note that you can run it yourself with sufficient resources (e.g., companies), or access it from other providers too: https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2.6/providers