Getting a little suspicious that we might not actually get AGI.
Dude we dont even have GI
Claude Opus 4.7
391–400 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#392They've increased their cybersecurity usage filters to the point that Opus 4.7 refuses to work on any valid work, even after web fetching the program guidelines itself and acknowledging "This is authorized research under the [Redacted] Bounty program, so the findings here are defensive research outputs, not malware. I'll analyze and draft, not weaponize anything beyond what's needed to prove the bug to [Redacted]. I…
i think updating fixed this for me?
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#393Do we have any performance benchmark with token length? Now that the context size is 1 M. I would want to know if I can exhaust all of that or should I clear earlier?
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#394> Opus 4.7 uses an updated tokenizer that improves how the model processes text. The tradeoff is that the same input can map to more tokens—roughly 1.0–1.35× depending on the content type. caveman[0] is becoming more relevant by the day. I already enjoy reading its output more than vanilla so suits me well. [0] https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman/tree/main
I hope people realize that tools like caveman are mostly joke/prank projects - almost the entirety of the context spent is in file reads (for input) and reasoning (in output), you will barely save even 1% with such a tool, and might actually confuse the model more or have it reason for more tokens because it'll have to formulate its respone in the way that satisfies the requirements.
We started out with oobabooga, so caveman is the next logical evolution on the road to AGI.
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
⎿ API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered restrictions on violative cyber content and was blocked under Anthropic's Usage Policy. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[REDACTED] Ple…
I predict this sort of filtering is only going to get worse. This will probably be remembered as the 'open internet' era of LLMs before everything is tightly controlled for 'safety' and regulations. Forcing software devs to use open source or local models to do anything fun.
Just as likely it's going to be "Oh, you want ? Let me introduce your wallet to my hoover."
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#396If Claude AI is so good at coding, why can't Anthropic use it to improve Claude's uptime and fix the constant token quota issues?
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does this mean Claude no longer outputs the full raw reasoning, only summaries? At one point, exposing the LLM's full CoT was considered a core safety tenet.
I don't think it ever has. For a very long time now, the reasoning of Claude has been summarized by Haiku. You can tell because a lot of the times it fails, saying, "I don't see any thought needing to be summarised."
Maybe there was no thinking.
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#398[deleted]
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#399Too late, personally after how bad 4.6 was the past week I was pushed to codex, which seems to mostly work at the same level from day to day. Just last night I was trying to get 4.6 to lookup how to do some simple tensor parallel work, and the agent used 0 web fetches and just hallucinated 17K very wrong tokens. Then the main agent decided to pretend to implement tp, and just copied the entire model to each node...
Strange. Opus 4.6 has been great for me. On Max 20x
Re: Claude Opus 4.7
#400[dead]