Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. *In that priority*
Reduce & Reuse by making it repairable!
51–60 of 79 posts
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. *In that priority*
Reduce & Reuse by making it repairable!
I really appreciate their effort to go towards more recycling, but to me a lot of this is completely moot as long as they don’t provide a stronger incentive to surrender your old devices for recycling. It’s actually really simple to reach $0 trade-in value due to absolutely silly things like a scratched display. Why would I be giving you back my iPhone for free when even glass bottles are $0.5 when recommissioned…
> Why would I be giving you back my iPhone for free As opposed to what? trashing it? You'd rather throw your iPhone in the trash than just hand it to them when you're in the store already?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why would I be giving you back my iPhone for free As opposed to what? trashing it? You'd rather throw your iPhone in the trash than just hand it to them when you're in the store already?
Resale or sticking it in a drawer "just in case"
It's the throwing it away that is the problem.
Not having a phone in the first place is the best for the environment. Failing that, having someone else reuse that phone is best. Only if all else fails is recycling the preferred option.
So of course people are going to concentrate on the problem of people just throwing these things away. And that's for anything. Not just phones.
Every device they take for "recycling" is a failure of the first 3 "R"s, especially if it is still working or it is just a dead battery, but is good for their business, so no wonder they insist on recycling.
I really like their work on packaging though. Not just because it reduces the plastic waste produced by Apple, it is not much in the grand scheme of things, but it also sets an example. Apple has always been a trendsetter when it comes to design, and their packaging is given a lot of attention.
If they want "eco progress" they should make their devices repairable. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. *In that priority* Reduce & Reuse by making it repairable! See: https://www.epa.gov/recycle
But the Reuse part is definitely served, at least in part, through repair.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In doing an "everyone knows" assessment, you should analyze iFixit scores over time, which is what reputation is built on, rather than a point in time. Additionally, we're talking about Apple as a whole, not just one product. They've had several Macbooks that had scores of 1/10, and the Airpods received a 0/10. Even a recent iPhone had its score reduced from a 7/10 down to a 4: https://www.ifixit.com/News/82493/we-ar…
Are there tradeoffs to repair-ability? I have machine washed my Airpods multiple times and they still work, and I use them for 3+ years. Seems like a good enough product, based on the alternatives available in the market.
However if we're going to talk about "eco progress" specifically we do have to talk about repairability. To be fair though, a long lasting product is probably more "green" than any easily repaired one in many circumstances.
Ah, good morning HN. Eager to read all the negativity about something that's on its face positive. XD Good job Apple. Now more to do.
How about stop making planned obsolence products? How about not charging outrageous prices when their computers need repair?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since they offer the EDU discount they might as well offer a blanket “it boots get $100 off” deal for returned machines. Though the cost of responsibly recycle and dispose of an old computer might make the $0 offer actually a decent one.
If they’re recycling it, what does it matter if it boots? The aluminum is worth nothing? I’m sure there’s bits of gold and other things.