Live data from Hacker News

Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

apple.com

1–10 of 79 posts

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#2
Does anyone know of a trustworthy third party that scrutinizes Apple's claims? I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than "100 percent recycled cobalt". That sounds great, but what about all the other metals? What does 'recycled' mean here, exactly? And so on.

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#3
post #2

Does anyone know of a trustworthy third party that scrutinizes Apple's claims? I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than "100 percent recycled cobalt". That sounds great, but what about all the other metals? What does 'recycled' mean here, exactly? And so on.

Not sure if it's trustworthy, but they ran into trouble advertising this in Europe: https://9to5mac.com/2023/10/24/carbon-neutral-apple-watch-cl...

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#4
post #2

Does anyone know of a trustworthy third party that scrutinizes Apple's claims? I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than "100 percent recycled cobalt". That sounds great, but what about all the other metals? What does 'recycled' mean here, exactly? And so on.

Check their annual report.

https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Pr...

To see previous ones, simply change the year in the URL.

You can get to that from apple.com/environment or apple.com/2030 (which redirects to the former). Near the end, right before and in the appendix you can find third-party independent reviews and assessments.

Now, are those trustworthy? I don’t know. But it gives you the context to start looking. The broader document will also probably help answer the other specific questions.

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#5
post #2

Does anyone know of a trustworthy third party that scrutinizes Apple's claims? I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than "100 percent recycled cobalt". That sounds great, but what about all the other metals? What does 'recycled' mean here, exactly? And so on.

They include their auditor's reports in their document, around page 100: https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Pr...

Do you also distrust those?

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#7
post #5
post #2

Does anyone know of a trustworthy third party that scrutinizes Apple's claims? I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than "100 percent recycled cobalt". That sounds great, but what about all the other metals? What does 'recycled' mean here, exactly? And so on.

They include their auditor's reports in their document, around page 100: https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Pr... Do you also distrust those?

> Do you also distrust those?

I suspect the OP made a mistake and forgot the word “not” in “I'm accusing Apple of lying, but I'd like to get more context than” (otherwise the “but” makes little sense).

I expect they are asking in good faith if there are audits, not accusing the auditors of being corrupt.

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#9
I really appreciate their effort to go towards more recycling, but to me a lot of this is completely moot as long as they don’t provide a stronger incentive to surrender your old devices for recycling. It’s actually really simple to reach $0 trade-in value due to absolutely silly things like a scratched display. Why would I be giving you back my iPhone for free when even glass bottles are $0.5 when recommissioned…

Re: Apple accelerates eco progress with highest-ever recycled materials

#10
post #6

Can we stop posting Apple's PR pieces here? Everyone knows they score the lowest on repairability so this really means shit.

> Everyone knows they score the lowest on repairability

Tell that to iFixit.

https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairabilit...

I’d trust their assessment more than a vague “everyone knows”. There’s nothing “everyone knows”.

Should Apple be better at repairability? Absolutely! But let’s criticise accurately and in good faith. When we don’t, points are easily dismissed and no one takes the valid parts seriously.

Post reply on HN