Live data from Hacker News

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

nytimes.com

721–730 of 905 posts

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#721
post #112

I found this amusing. >P.G.P., a free encryption program used by antinuclear activists and human rights groups to shield their files and emails from government surveillance. I find it fascinating to see how the users of a program change, based on how a reporter wants to build or diminish. At least it's going in a positive direction today.

The New York Times has some great journalists and does important work, but they certainly have an editorial bias/agenda on most topics, even though it's often subtle. People claiming they are neutral on most topics are just not seeing it, because it aligns with their slant. Just saying it's interesting to see when folks notice it or not on hackernews.

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#722
post #312

Simple question for anyone who’s familiar with this world of journalism: how does the author and the NYTimes cope with the fact that making such claims paint a huge target on the person they claim to have “unmasked”? Satoshi’s wallets are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and there have been kidnappings/torture/murders for much less than that. Do they just not care about the ethical implications? And really, for…

Yes, this seems like one of those cases where "the public is curious" and "the public has a right to know" are being blurred together

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#723
post #112

I found this amusing. >P.G.P., a free encryption program used by antinuclear activists and human rights groups to shield their files and emails from government surveillance. I find it fascinating to see how the users of a program change, based on how a reporter wants to build or diminish. At least it's going in a positive direction today.

It's technically true, but it's also a very selective framing

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#724
post #668
post #112

I found this amusing. >P.G.P., a free encryption program used by antinuclear activists and human rights groups to shield their files and emails from government surveillance. I find it fascinating to see how the users of a program change, based on how a reporter wants to build or diminish. At least it's going in a positive direction today.

I found that entire section amusing. Some choice quotes: > So does Bitcoin. A Bitcoin user has two keys: a public key, from which an address is derived that acts as a digital safe deposit box; and a private key, which is the secret combination used to unlock that box and spend the coins it contains. > How interesting, I thought, that Mr. Back’s grad-school hobby involved the same cryptographic technique that Satoshi…

> public key encryption and c++! It must be him.

I'm now worried I've secretly been Satoshi the whole time.

Lmao. I really expected better from the guy who unmasked Theranos.

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#726
post #79

Pretty compelling story. Not necessarily for its revelations, but for the fact that John Carreyrou and the NYT decided to publish it at all. If it were by anyone else, I would have stopped reading after the first thousand words of meandering narrative, but Carreyrou is staking his massive and impeccable investigative journalistic reputation on this mountain of circumstantial evidence and statistical analysis. Him tor…

Also, Szabo's whole reputation comes from bit gold and years of writing about exactly these ideas

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#727

I found this article about as compelling as all the other attempts at identifying him. Half of the cypherpunks (I was pretty active) had the same set of interests in public key cryptography, libertarianism, anonymity, criticism of copyright, and predecessor systems like Chaum's ecash; we talked about those in virtually every meeting. The most compelling evidence is Adam Back's body language, as subjectively observed…

If you were around those circles, a lot of the "signals" in the article just look like the shared baseline culture rather than anything uniquely identifying

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#728

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you miss the part where Satoshi came to Adam's rescue, to thwart big blocks? https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB37...

it was probably not the real Satoshi, but a scammer. they are pretty common in there. https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de... https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/1c295af4831b1a0f6fc85dc6dab...

I don't see any evidence of a scam.

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#729
I doubt anyone who claims to be, to know, or to have seen evidence of, Satoshi Nakamoto.

Journalists see this as their Moby dick story, their Jimmy Hoffa, as the real Satoshi knew that for Bitcoin to work and be taken seriously, he/she/it would have to be anonymous and take no part in it. Truly decentralized.

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator

#730
post #372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah the weird thing about living in a democracy is you have to convince people who don't agree with you to do things. Maybe try better politics rather than attacks or else you'll go another 30 years of no nuclear power then die without realizing your dream of nearly free clean unlimited power.

> people who don't agree with you to do things. the problem is that those people who don't agree with me are also not taking the externalized cost of non-action.

That's fine but as someone whose side hobby is literally politics, it's not hard to convince people that disagree with you to join your side. This is what organizing is, please note I am not talking about discussing things online (advocacy). Online advocacy is by far the worse form of politics, albeit the most popular, where you will rarely, if ever, convince anyone of anything.

You're going to have to go out and speak with people that disagree with you person to person to try to convince them to join your cause.

If you can't do this, you won't succeed.

Post reply on HN