Live data from Hacker News

Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

skoda-storyboard.com

141–150 of 618 posts

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#142
post #91
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depending on how much traffic there is, combining them is fine.

Yes, but I would consider it somewhat rude to use the bell in a space where both bikes and pedestrians are allowed. If it would be required to be used regularly, I'd say the path is badly designed. I used to commute to work by bike in ~1M city in Europe, mostly on dedicated bike lanes, but some shared, and had just the smallest, barely audible bell, only because it was required by law. I don't remember using it much…

Different folks have different preferences.

I agree that on a footpath pedestrians should be treated as having priority.

A semi-common way I use my bell: when on a shared footpath with plenty of space to take over, I often use my bell when I'm still ten meters away, so that I don't give pedestrians are heart attack by suddenly dashing right past them.

(I have a nice ding dong bell. They don't seem to mind. It also helps that I often have a cheerful five year old in the back.)

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#144
post #116

Do horns and bells really prevent accidents? In order for e.g. a horn to work you need enough time that the driver processes the situation and decides the horn will communicate something AND enough time for the pedestrian or whatever to process that and react to it. Generally it's a lot easier just to press the brake, and more importantly be travelling at a speed and in a manner where the brake is sufficient. Structu…

A car company wanting to divert attention away from the carnage cars cause. Seems a bit suspicious no?

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#145
post #116

Do horns and bells really prevent accidents? In order for e.g. a horn to work you need enough time that the driver processes the situation and decides the horn will communicate something AND enough time for the pedestrian or whatever to process that and react to it. Generally it's a lot easier just to press the brake, and more importantly be travelling at a speed and in a manner where the brake is sufficient. Structu…

I concur. Even the best bell in the world may be utterly useless if the pedestrian happens to be deaf. Also, bicycle bells tend to polarise pedestrians - some people think that bells are rude and insisting that peds get out of the way and other people think it's dangerous and rude to not use a bell every time you overtake. My solution is to still have a tiny bell on my road bike, but instead of using it, call out som…

On my bike commute route, I'd lose my voice before the first meeting of the day if I had to use only my voice.

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#146
post #116

Do horns and bells really prevent accidents? In order for e.g. a horn to work you need enough time that the driver processes the situation and decides the horn will communicate something AND enough time for the pedestrian or whatever to process that and react to it. Generally it's a lot easier just to press the brake, and more importantly be travelling at a speed and in a manner where the brake is sufficient. Structu…

Bicycle bells are mostly for warning pedestrians when approaching from behind and passing on shared-use trails. I ride on shared infrastructure and cannot afford to build new infrastructure when my town will not. Not warning a pedestrian when approaching from behind introduces the possibility of collision if the pedestrian makes a sudden change in his walking course. I typically use this etiquette:

Passing a single pedestrian or runner on a quiet day: no bell, coasting for a short bit with a loud free hub (the rotating ratchet element on the rear wheel) alerts the pedestrian to my presence.

Passing a runner: normal ring from a distance so they have knowledge that the bicycle is passing

Passing a cyclist: one loud ring from a distance

Passing a pedestrian walking a dog: two loud rings, one far, one close, so that the pedestrian is aware of the approaching bicycle and he can prevent his dog from running at me/colliding. Many dogs do seem to enjoy a bicycle chase.

Antisocial pedestrians (i.e., walking side-by-side such as to be blocking the path in both directions, preventing the bicyclist from passing): several loud rings of the bell until the antisocial activity has abated. Announcements in my local tongue (not English) that they impede the flow of traffic.

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#147

Draw a line, say this is for bicycles, pedestrians and cars have no business here, and bikes have no business being on any other lane as long as these exist. When bikes have to go through areas where people walk freely, they need to limit their speed to a walking pace. People should not wear headphones (noise-cancelling or not) when going through traffic as pedestrians. Take them off when crossing! People should not…

> Draw a line, say this is for bicycles, pedestrians and cars have no business here, and bikes have no business being on any other lane as long as these exist.

This is the reality in many cities, if it weren't for the hopefully not surprising fact that people don't always obey traffic laws perfectly.

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#148
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This only leaves open how to enforce all of it without everybody shouting domestic terror.

How do we enforce seatbelts? (1) Assume the public aren't stupid. (2) Assume the public aren't murderers. (3) Explain the risk-benefit analysis through informative videos like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_(1998_film) . People can shout "domestic terror" all they like, but if it's not true, it's not true.

You are answering different question. What you are saying is called awareness campaign or something. Enforcement of seatbelts is done by police with fines/tickets and is possible cause it's visible from outside.

Other things like loudness levels inside cars cannot be monitored without going in full totalitarian mode.

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#149
post #10

Video version which has more detail than the text: https://youtu.be/zDaVPfpQvPI?is=sSyjXf07r9cg9r4Y Bit cringe marketing though.

I find the "Heard five seconds earlier, the difference between a serious collision and stepping aside" take hilarious. As if there is no other way to prevent a collision in five seconds other than the pedestrian getting out of the way. As much as I get the urge to plow through pedestrians on bike paths (and stay proudly in the way of bikes on pedestrian paths), in real life, normal people don't do that kind of thing.…

But if you go at 40km/h the time goes down to one or two seconds!

Re: Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones

#150
Cool idea. But bizarre that they worked with Deliveroo. Bike bells were designed for a time when cyclists travelled at speeds where you could safely get out of the way.

Most "independent" cyclists do cycle safely.

But delivery riders for delivery platforms commonly use illegally modified e-bikes. Platforms have the GPS data. They must know.

They could make huge improvements in safety by actively preventing the use of illegally modified e-bikes that travel too fast.

Post reply on HN