Live data from Hacker News

Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

tomshardware.com

71–80 of 179 posts

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#71
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Slight tangent, but to me futuristic cities are actually places like Amsterdam, with cozy streets and bike lanes everywhere, not places like Dubai with 16-lane freeways and a quasi-slave underclass staffing the tacky malls.

Its sad that people think the "future" is all about owning stuff for yourself and not what the city can provide to its population.

Why is it said? Being independent to the degree possible is the best state for human being I think.

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#73
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Middle East isn’t some 3rd world. If you can imagine futuristic cities, rich Middle East countries are already living in them with all the oil wealth. They have phones, computers, digital services just like the US and Europe. Makes sense they want a data center in the region, close to them just like the US and Europe have data enters close to their users.

Slight tangent, but to me futuristic cities are actually places like Amsterdam, with cozy streets and bike lanes everywhere, not places like Dubai with 16-lane freeways and a quasi-slave underclass staffing the tacky malls.

I guess it depends on if you were a Gibson fan or an Asimov fan as a teen

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#74

Not to be insensitive about the humanitarian and economic situation, but, I am curious why there are data centers in that region at all? It just seems horribly inefficient from a cooling and electricity standpoint. Not to mention water. My pessimistic assumption is that Amazon said "yes" to handouts from regional government efforts to be relevant in tech, and that those data centers dont really matter to anyone but l…

Middle East isn’t some 3rd world. If you can imagine futuristic cities, rich Middle East countries are already living in them with all the oil wealth. They have phones, computers, digital services just like the US and Europe. Makes sense they want a data center in the region, close to them just like the US and Europe have data enters close to their users.

So... The future is Dubai? I am still to hear a better argument in favor of extinction.

This reminds me of a quote from "Stranger Than Fiction":

> Harold: "I don't want to eat nothing but pancakes, I want to live! I mean, who in their right mind in a choice between pancakes and living chooses pancakes?"

> Dr. Hilbert: "Harold, if you pause to think, you'd realize that that answer is inextricably contingent upon the type of life being led... and, of course, the quality of the pancakes"

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#75
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that they don't want to hit the ones in Israel, it's that they're better defended, and further away. Bahrain to Iran is ~140 miles. Dubai is ~100 miles. Israel is closer to ~600.

No doubt. But it still seems like a bizarre strategy. They can't shoot the people they want so they just shoot these other randoms.

>"They can't shoot the people they want so they just shoot these other randoms."

Same as sanctions. There are many places where they can not tell governments what to do, so they suffocate general population

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#76
post #9

I do think there is some irony that the Iran war took down all the AWS datacenters in the middle east except the one (or 3 i guess) in Israel, which is still chugging along. Like as a strategy its kind of weird. Iran plans to force Israel to stop by wrecking the economies of a bunch of countries that are basically frenemies of Israel? I suppose its meant to pressure USA, it just seems like a terrible strategy.

> I do think there is some irony that the Iran war took down all the AWS datacenters in the middle east except the one (or 3 i guess) in Israel, which is still chugging along.

... For now.

> Like as a strategy its kind of weird. Iran plans to force Israel to stop by wrecking the economies of a bunch of countries that are basically frenemies of Israel? I suppose its meant to pressure USA, it just seems like a terrible strategy.

The gulf countries are enemies of Iran. In fact, they are a lot cozier to Israel.

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do Americans do what they want because they are “allowed” by gulf states?

You need to think that all the way through. The answer is obviously yes. Yemen is a perfect example. Iran is obviously as well. Afghanistan another great case. It is certainly possible to resist US pressure. Iran is asking the gulf countries to do that. Imagine how much better they would all be able to resist the US together as well, better than each alone.

> The answer is obviously yes.

Of course it isn't. In reality, being able to resist requires power. Power that's gained more or less independently such as Iran's. Gulf states should be in a position of power to able to resist US presence. The power they have right now is mostly gained through the help of USA and its allies. It's not the same as Iran. Not even close.

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need to think that all the way through. The answer is obviously yes. Yemen is a perfect example. Iran is obviously as well. Afghanistan another great case. It is certainly possible to resist US pressure. Iran is asking the gulf countries to do that. Imagine how much better they would all be able to resist the US together as well, better than each alone.

> The answer is obviously yes. Of course it isn't. In reality, being able to resist requires power. Power that's gained more or less independently such as Iran's. Gulf states should be in a position of power to able to resist US presence. The power they have right now is mostly gained through the help of USA and its allies. It's not the same as Iran. Not even close.

> Of course it isn't. In reality, being able to resist requires power.

I gave examples of it actually happening. If sandal-wearing Houthis can resist, then well-funded oil states can as well. The Taliban beat the US. In fact, very few people have failed at ejecting the US from the country when they tried if you think back. The US tends to lose a lot.

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#79
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its sad that people think the "future" is all about owning stuff for yourself and not what the city can provide to its population.

Why is it said? Being independent to the degree possible is the best state for human being I think.

Do you think we became the dominant species by being independent loners, or by forming complex interdependent groups?

Re: Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need to think that all the way through. The answer is obviously yes. Yemen is a perfect example. Iran is obviously as well. Afghanistan another great case. It is certainly possible to resist US pressure. Iran is asking the gulf countries to do that. Imagine how much better they would all be able to resist the US together as well, better than each alone.

The gulf countries hate Iran and have for a very very long time, longer than even the concept of the west has existed. Iran throwing around ballistic missiles is far more like a temper tantrum than a viable military strategy. And its a strategic gift to Trump. Whether he/we can take advantage of that, IDK.

I'm not so sure it's a strategic gift for Trump. Before the war (oh, sorry, I meant the "special military operation") everything was largely fine for the Gulf states. Now, it's not.
Post reply on HN