German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
1–10 of 799 posts
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#2Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#3Not all men, but all men over 17 and under the age of 45. This still seems draconian, though.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#4Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#5That seems more “oh we fucked up and didn’t realize our changes to the law imply this” than “Germany forces men to request permission to leave”.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#6Not all men, but all men over 17 and under the age of 45. This still seems draconian, though.
Number of characters for the title is limited. And while I wouldn't necessarily call it draconian because after all somebody has to defend my country; it in deed comes as a shock. And it is also shocking that I just randomly stumbled over this news article when this law is in effect already for 3 months. How is it possible that our news talk about all sorts of nonsense but not about something as fundamentally relevan…
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Number of characters for the title is limited. And while I wouldn't necessarily call it draconian because after all somebody has to defend my country; it in deed comes as a shock. And it is also shocking that I just randomly stumbled over this news article when this law is in effect already for 3 months. How is it possible that our news talk about all sorts of nonsense but not about something as fundamentally relevan…
I agree in general. One reason we haven't heard anything about it might be that the administration already admitted that this legislation needs correction or at least clarification, as mentioned in the article.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Number of characters for the title is limited. And while I wouldn't necessarily call it draconian because after all somebody has to defend my country; it in deed comes as a shock. And it is also shocking that I just randomly stumbled over this news article when this law is in effect already for 3 months. How is it possible that our news talk about all sorts of nonsense but not about something as fundamentally relevan…
I agree in general. One reason we haven't heard anything about it might be that the administration already admitted that this legislation needs correction or at least clarification, as mentioned in the article.