Live data from Hacker News

Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

cnn.com

61–70 of 127 posts

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was also indefensible. A few years back she campaigned on prosecuting pedophiles and, well, as AG she refused to do that. She went as far as protecting them.

Republicans simply don’t use words the same way others do. If you say you like flowers in the garden you mean they should be there. If they say they like flowers in the garden, they mean they would like to be paid to control whether they are there.

[flagged]

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And I didn't say she should remain. I'm not sure about the "bad people" characterization though. Certainly she is a terrible person but if you are interested in having the least terrible AG you need to worry about her replacement. If by "bad people" you mean people who betrayed the electorate, I think she's been an extremely faithful advocate of the MAGA agenda. Considering the president is unable to acknowledge anyt…

I think quite a lot of MAGA wanted the complete release of the Epstein files, so maybe not extremely faithful to the electorate...

I think that was just a meaningless rally chant like "build the wall" and "no new wars". Why would they vote for the guy's friend and possible client if they actually wanted the files released (and predators prosecuted)?

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#65
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Even referencing the auto pen nonsense pens(ha) you as irrational.

yep. Politicians have been using them for over 100 years, including Thomas Jefferson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopen

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#66

Let's hope she doesn't get a pardon before he leaves office.

I guess I wasn't paying enough attention, for what would she get charged? I know about the illegal appointments of US attorneys, the vindictive attempted prosecutions against Trump's perceived enemies, and some problems with the Epstein file releases, but I thought all those were under the category of "incompetency". Did she lie to congress or something like that?

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#67

The timing coincides with her office getting embarrassed in front of the Supreme Court, with Trump in artendance. P2025 had a plan but it was always going to struggle against the president's personality issues.

Trying to argue the 14th amendment doesn’t read as plainly as it does was a no-win situation. The government would have to argue it does not have jurisdiction (subject to the jurisdiction thereof) over illegal immigrants which would seemingly (IANAL) mean they’re immune to prosecution for any crime. You could probably find a hair splitting argument that the child must be born in an actual ‘State’, but aside from that…

Her job (under the current president):

1. Be unquestioningly loyal to the president

2. Prosecute his enemies, such as Comey, Bolton, and Perkins Coie

3. Reward his allies, such as Eric Adams, everyone who violates the Hatch Act in a way that pleases him, and the people he tells to sue the USG so he can direct the DoJ to settle

4. Put crazy stuff like birthright citizenship and IEEPA in front of the Supreme Court

5. Slow roll the Epstein files, don't prosecute anyone

6. Expedite deportations by any means necessary

How much more can you ask of her?

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#69
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Republicans simply don’t use words the same way others do. If you say you like flowers in the garden you mean they should be there. If they say they like flowers in the garden, they mean they would like to be paid to control whether they are there.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would imagine that’s SOP at this point.

[flagged]

I'm not worked up at all about the auto-pen. But presidents should not be pardoning friends and family (although friends seem to get pardoned quite frequently). If a president feels it's important to do so, that president should wait until they are an ex-president and petition the next person in power.
Post reply on HN