Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would imagine that’s SOP at this point.
[flagged]
Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
61–70 of 127 posts
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was also indefensible. A few years back she campaigned on prosecuting pedophiles and, well, as AG she refused to do that. She went as far as protecting them.
Republicans simply don’t use words the same way others do. If you say you like flowers in the garden you mean they should be there. If they say they like flowers in the garden, they mean they would like to be paid to control whether they are there.
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I didn't say she should remain. I'm not sure about the "bad people" characterization though. Certainly she is a terrible person but if you are interested in having the least terrible AG you need to worry about her replacement. If by "bad people" you mean people who betrayed the electorate, I think she's been an extremely faithful advocate of the MAGA agenda. Considering the president is unable to acknowledge anyt…
I think quite a lot of MAGA wanted the complete release of the Epstein files, so maybe not extremely faithful to the electorate...
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#64The bus is always idling at the curb; Trump cronies never seem to realize that eventually, everyone gets thrown under it.
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Even referencing the auto pen nonsense pens(ha) you as irrational.
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#66Let's hope she doesn't get a pardon before he leaves office.
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#67The timing coincides with her office getting embarrassed in front of the Supreme Court, with Trump in artendance. P2025 had a plan but it was always going to struggle against the president's personality issues.
Trying to argue the 14th amendment doesn’t read as plainly as it does was a no-win situation. The government would have to argue it does not have jurisdiction (subject to the jurisdiction thereof) over illegal immigrants which would seemingly (IANAL) mean they’re immune to prosecution for any crime. You could probably find a hair splitting argument that the child must be born in an actual ‘State’, but aside from that…
1. Be unquestioningly loyal to the president
2. Prosecute his enemies, such as Comey, Bolton, and Perkins Coie
3. Reward his allies, such as Eric Adams, everyone who violates the Hatch Act in a way that pleases him, and the people he tells to sue the USG so he can direct the DoJ to settle
4. Put crazy stuff like birthright citizenship and IEEPA in front of the Supreme Court
5. Slow roll the Epstein files, don't prosecute anyone
6. Expedite deportations by any means necessary
How much more can you ask of her?
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#68Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Republicans simply don’t use words the same way others do. If you say you like flowers in the garden you mean they should be there. If they say they like flowers in the garden, they mean they would like to be paid to control whether they are there.
[flagged]
Re: Trump fires Pam Bondi as attorney general
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would imagine that’s SOP at this point.
[flagged]