Its time to start trying to push Chat Control 2.0. With enough money and infinite retries eventually all the bad regulations with a power group behind will end being approved.
End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
161–170 of 324 posts
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could have a system where everyone is directly elected while keeping checks and balances, if voting were restricted , eg. maybe everyone can vote for a president/prime minister, but only non-teachers can vote for an education minister, and only non-finance people can vote for something like the Fed chief, etc. The point being the checks and balances now happen because other groups keep your group in check by voti…
Absolutely! That does keep some of the checks. You can do better than that though! It's like on the Apollo missions where some parts were made by two completely different manufacturers and worked completely differently. Hybrid political systems are best. Of course if we like democracy (and most people do), then that should be the most common kind of component. But I'd still like to have some different paradigms mixed…
Maybe also a 3rd chamber, where the weight of your vote was proportional to IQ (much more palatable in EU than US).
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#163Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-elected representatives from my country keep pushing for chat control via the council. How do I, as a citizen, hold them accountable?
> Non-elected representatives from my country keep pushing for chat control via the council. How do I, as a citizen, hold them accountable? How is that an EU problem? Without the EU, like here in the UK, we had non-elected lobbyists pressuring our elected government to implement age checks, message scanning, etc. And it is still continuing. You're fighting the wrong fight by blaming the EU for this.
EU has checks and balances that were intended for a trade union, not a nascent superstate. If we don't implement proper checks and balances in a real fucking hurry, we'll wake up one morning and realize the EU has turned into another Soviet union, and by then it'll be far too late to do anything about it.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We do? What did you think the European Parliament elections every four years were for? Probably it is not taught as part of the curriculum in Russia.
Ah, looks like they're American, based on their profile.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#166Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#167We will see many new initiatives, old wine in a new bottle. Any bet that EU diehard bureaucrats will change tune, not the goal. They are going to use the so called salami tactic.
Death of free speech by many cuts, so to say. It is in the left wing DNA. Have a look at German history regarding "Landes-Verfassungsschutz" units. It is disturbing to read this article here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verfassungsschutz_Nordrhein-We...
And back then already it was the so called center-right party ruled against this left wing initiative - imagine, first thing you do right after WW2 is ramping up a control unit to control freedom of speech.
Please value free speech. Agree to disagree, but remember: those who live by prohibitions will ultimately use this tool against you as well. Consider wisely what is something you dislike personally and simply exercise your right to not listen to certain voices or appeal to prohibition.
Prohibition becomes a tool and everybody knows that people love to use their tools. And since I have a law degree, often times what you plan is not what is finally what courts decide, how they apply the law.
Freedom rights are fundamental.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#168[flagged]
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't quite get it, so the conservatives wanted/want to repeat the vote but also the EPP voted against it and the Socialists supported it?
European parliament parties are really not particularly cohesive, and the EPP in particular is a bit of a random mess; it is _broadly_ liberal-conservative and pro-European, but its membership is a bit all over the place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_People%27s_Party#Full... Note that in some countries it has _both ruling coalition and opposition_ member parties.