Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta is like one giant cancer that grew a few small tumors of benign[1] nature, like some of their efforts in open source and open research (React, Llama, etc.). [1]: I could be wrong thinking those are benign.
I think Zstandard would be the most benign example.
Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
191–200 of 579 posts
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#192The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
Actually. Meta is spending millions to push the age verification requirement off to the app store providers, such as Google and Apple. It's an attempt to shield Meta from liability, transfer it to the app providers.
and makes more sense, Apple and Google have your credit card , or if you are a parent that bought soem phone for you child then at first boot up as a parent should be your job to setup a child account.
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#193Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta is like one giant cancer that grew a few small tumors of benign[1] nature, like some of their efforts in open source and open research (React, Llama, etc.). [1]: I could be wrong thinking those are benign.
React benign? That’s the first time I’ve seen this suggestion on HN. Usually it’s held responsible for great crimes and wrongs.
Anyways, is there a "just use vue" effort like there is with postgres :)
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#195Maybe I'm just getting old and cynical but, while I think current social media is bad for children, I'm very suspicious of the current international agreement that it's time to take action, especially with all the ID verification coming from multiple avenues
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#196Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#197The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
Actually. Meta is spending millions to push the age verification requirement off to the app store providers, such as Google and Apple. It's an attempt to shield Meta from liability, transfer it to the app providers.
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#198Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#199Who is getting paid the $375m?
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#200As much as everyone hates Meta for selling people's personal data, this is absolutely ridiculous. The hysteria regarding forcing companies do parents' job doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Stopping misleading advertisments and mental health issues while claiming to be protecting children is not on the parents. The parents were given the false information to believe their kids would be safe.