Do we have to wait for any appeals before the performative mail out settlement checks for $1 routine?
Or the settlements goes to the state and no one ever sees a dollar.
Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
101–110 of 579 posts
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#102Seems insufficient to keep Social Security solvent after 2040.
Are the kids alright?
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#103The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers.
Their stated reason? Child safety.
Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#104Cost of doing business...
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#105The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
My guess: to discriminate whether traffic is from a humam or bot to improve ad delivery metrics.
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#106The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
Of course it's for the protection of the children!
Why else would they want to sneakily add facial recognition to smart glasses?! /s https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-ray-ban-smart-glasses-f...
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#107The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
Meta is like one giant cancer that grew a few small tumors of benign[1] nature, like some of their efforts in open source and open research (React, Llama, etc.).
[1]: I could be wrong thinking those are benign.
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#108Maybe I'm just getting old and cynical but, while I think current social media is bad for children, I'm very suspicious of the current international agreement that it's time to take action, especially with all the ID verification coming from multiple avenues
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#109The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.
[deleted]
Re: Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms
#110Cost of doing business...
This. Meta made $60B in net income in 2025.