How did they conclude dolphins and whales are self-aware comparatively to humans? That seems like quite a large claim to make and the argument significantly hinges on this.
I wasn't aware of any scientific method to prove self awareness.
21–30 of 196 posts
How did they conclude dolphins and whales are self-aware comparatively to humans? That seems like quite a large claim to make and the argument significantly hinges on this.
I wasn't aware of any scientific method to prove self awareness.
Rights come with Obligations, so as long as they pay their taxes too, I'm OK with this
Sorry, but I'm going to need a Dolphin declaration of independence, armed revolution and ability to self sustain through value creation first.
By "armed revolution" you're implying that someone has rights only if they are able to defend them. While that seems pragmatic, it actually destroys the definition of "rights". Saying "X has a right to live" means "you shouldn't kill X." That's a completely different statement from "you will not be able to kill X." Morality is concerned with what you are obligated to do or not do, apart from your preferences or abili…
This has been hashed out before. Doesn't go well for "rights" in the sense you mean.
I'm okay with this.
I'd be a lot more sympathetic to the cause of treating dolphins as if they had human rights if we first agreed to treat all humans as if they had human rights.
>> They believe dolphins and whales are sufficiently intelligent to justify the same ethical considerations as humans. I don't have a problem with extending legal protection to dolphins, but I do think that "intelligence" as the criteria is morally problematic, at least if it's the sole criteria. For instance, could a person with Down's Syndrome be denied protection from murder? The Christian worldview holds that hum…
Rather than saying certain categories of animals should have the same rights as humans, maybe we'd be better off saying certain categories of animals deserve a higher level of ethical and legal consideration.
>> They believe dolphins and whales are sufficiently intelligent to justify the same ethical considerations as humans. I don't have a problem with extending legal protection to dolphins, but I do think that "intelligence" as the criteria is morally problematic, at least if it's the sole criteria. For instance, could a person with Down's Syndrome be denied protection from murder? The Christian worldview holds that hum…
>> They believe dolphins and whales are sufficiently intelligent to justify the same ethical considerations as humans. I don't have a problem with extending legal protection to dolphins, but I do think that "intelligence" as the criteria is morally problematic, at least if it's the sole criteria. For instance, could a person with Down's Syndrome be denied protection from murder? The Christian worldview holds that hum…
Now, are dolphins at the same level as vegetable humans? Clearly not. Is the bar to which we hold them higher than that, since we lack the same emotional connections? I suspect, in reality, yes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it could easily be argued that the dolphins' way of life is more sustainable than ours... Probably not the best line of argument!
You think humans chasing small fish around in the surf is a superior way to live? Seriously? There is nothing stopping you...just keep walking west. :)