Live data from Hacker News

Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

thewave.engineer

1–10 of 343 posts

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#3

"that familiar click is the sound of a carefully engineered interference fit designed to hold firm but still be easy for small hands to pull apart." My recent experience calls bs on pulling them apart.

The tolerance is definitely more applicable to the getting them apart then putting them together.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#4

"that familiar click is the sound of a carefully engineered interference fit designed to hold firm but still be easy for small hands to pull apart." My recent experience calls bs on pulling them apart.

I always remember the small, weird pieces being hard to get apart.

What I don't remember was every kit being made up of so many small, weird pieces.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#5
Curious how this might have played out over the long-term with their licensed/abandoned/revived/then bought to kill permanently "Modulex":

https://archinect.com/features/article/149974598/the-brief-a...

I wish one of their competitors would take up this dimension standard --- it would be a lot more useful for making structures which interact across dimensions/rotations.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#6
More than just bricks fitting into each other at a superficial level, it matters how firmly they fit together, and it's one of the areas where LEGO is generally superior to the similar types of bricks.

A detail I didn't realise until I was an adult was the difference between the black and grey technic connecting pins. They look interchangeable, and for a lot of things they are.

But there's a fraction of a mm raised lines on the black one, and it's enough to produce significantly more friction, and that difference is utilised in designs.

And apprently there's now a new version of the black one, and people notice these things, and measure them - this article gives an idea of just how these tiny changes, well below tolerances for some of the "knockoffs", can produce a different effect:

https://ramblingbrick.com/2021/01/27/what-if-they-introduced...

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#7
>The frequently cited "0.002mm tolerance" is misleading without context. LEGO's actual mold precision is 10 microns, but different features have different critical tolerances.

The article never mentions what piece has a 0.002mm tolerance. Is there any such piece? If there's no such piece, then "0.002mm tolerance" is not just "misleading without context", it's straight up false.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#8
post #7

>The frequently cited "0.002mm tolerance" is misleading without context. LEGO's actual mold precision is 10 microns, but different features have different critical tolerances. The article never mentions what piece has a 0.002mm tolerance. Is there any such piece? If there's no such piece, then "0.002mm tolerance" is not just "misleading without context", it's straight up false.

Is it a language mixup, ±0.001mm being called a 0.002mm tolerance? Otherwise I cant figure it out either lol.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#9
post #6

More than just bricks fitting into each other at a superficial level, it matters how firmly they fit together, and it's one of the areas where LEGO is generally superior to the similar types of bricks. A detail I didn't realise until I was an adult was the difference between the black and grey technic connecting pins. They look interchangeable, and for a lot of things they are. But there's a fraction of a mm raised l…

> it's one of the areas where LEGO is generally superior to the similar types of bricks

Imho, this is, objectively, not true (anymore).

Pantasy with GoBricks are superior in coloring and fit; Cobi are excellent for things that should not be taken apart anymore (like tank models); Lumibricks are excellent in fit and have amazing illumination solutions that are lightyears (haha) ahead of lego.

Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)

#10
After working in automotive, this is less impressive than it appears.

Tons of dimensions on 100k/yr injection molded(and otherwise) parts have similar dimensions. (Although admittedly, after testing in pre-production, I don't know if they are tested again and have drift)

Lego has been making the same parts for decades and their parts are extremely simple. I imagine their 1-off parts for intellectual property based sets do not have this requirement.

I think Lego has a huge incentive to promote this idea that they are high quality to justify the enormous price of decades old technology.

Post reply on HN