Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
1–10 of 343 posts
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#2My recent experience calls bs on pulling them apart.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#3"that familiar click is the sound of a carefully engineered interference fit designed to hold firm but still be easy for small hands to pull apart." My recent experience calls bs on pulling them apart.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#4"that familiar click is the sound of a carefully engineered interference fit designed to hold firm but still be easy for small hands to pull apart." My recent experience calls bs on pulling them apart.
What I don't remember was every kit being made up of so many small, weird pieces.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#5https://archinect.com/features/article/149974598/the-brief-a...
I wish one of their competitors would take up this dimension standard --- it would be a lot more useful for making structures which interact across dimensions/rotations.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#6A detail I didn't realise until I was an adult was the difference between the black and grey technic connecting pins. They look interchangeable, and for a lot of things they are.
But there's a fraction of a mm raised lines on the black one, and it's enough to produce significantly more friction, and that difference is utilised in designs.
And apprently there's now a new version of the black one, and people notice these things, and measure them - this article gives an idea of just how these tiny changes, well below tolerances for some of the "knockoffs", can produce a different effect:
https://ramblingbrick.com/2021/01/27/what-if-they-introduced...
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#7The article never mentions what piece has a 0.002mm tolerance. Is there any such piece? If there's no such piece, then "0.002mm tolerance" is not just "misleading without context", it's straight up false.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#8>The frequently cited "0.002mm tolerance" is misleading without context. LEGO's actual mold precision is 10 microns, but different features have different critical tolerances. The article never mentions what piece has a 0.002mm tolerance. Is there any such piece? If there's no such piece, then "0.002mm tolerance" is not just "misleading without context", it's straight up false.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#9More than just bricks fitting into each other at a superficial level, it matters how firmly they fit together, and it's one of the areas where LEGO is generally superior to the similar types of bricks. A detail I didn't realise until I was an adult was the difference between the black and grey technic connecting pins. They look interchangeable, and for a lot of things they are. But there's a fraction of a mm raised l…
Imho, this is, objectively, not true (anymore).
Pantasy with GoBricks are superior in coloring and fit; Cobi are excellent for things that should not be taken apart anymore (like tank models); Lumibricks are excellent in fit and have amazing illumination solutions that are lightyears (haha) ahead of lego.
Re: Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)
#10Tons of dimensions on 100k/yr injection molded(and otherwise) parts have similar dimensions. (Although admittedly, after testing in pre-production, I don't know if they are tested again and have drift)
Lego has been making the same parts for decades and their parts are extremely simple. I imagine their 1-off parts for intellectual property based sets do not have this requirement.
I think Lego has a huge incentive to promote this idea that they are high quality to justify the enormous price of decades old technology.